He does make it harder than it needs to be. He's basically just advocating for caution with SSI. Here are some good quotes:

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqpxfgpzp978pfzrv6n9xhq5tvenl9e74pklmskh4xw6vxxyp3j8qkke3cezqy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq32amnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwv3sk6atn9e5k7tcpr9mhxue69uhkscnj9e3k7unpvdkx2tnnda3kjctv9uqzpr6ksge2ukqez6s2a0utrv5d8ly2y5h7sz464s0la0hau45zk7830wa06q

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqpxfgpzp978pfzrv6n9xhq5tvenl9e74pklmskh4xw6vxxyp3j8qkke3cezqy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgewaehxw309a5xyu3wvdhhyctrd3jjuum0vd5kzmp0qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uqzqyu9dcm4jcjm3l0l7u3sjsmsdzjgmerlt9d5gpfzyctp4lml5255zudqqc

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqpxfgpzp978pfzrv6n9xhq5tvenl9e74pklmskh4xw6vxxyp3j8qkke3cezqy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgewaehxw309a5xyu3wvdhhyctrd3jjuum0vd5kzmp0qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uqzpl04sg4qhrgt869x30afzhm9q6mxuqalascflsythfgl0zzupd2rfeww8s

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqpxfgpzp978pfzrv6n9xhq5tvenl9e74pklmskh4xw6vxxyp3j8qkke3cezqy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctcpr9mhxue69uhkscnj9e3k7unpvdkx2tnnda3kjctv9uqzpfzg27wvjark6k7uvpd40sphv6n3tt83f26axtkkkhguagjj4uqj4md4yq

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqpxfgpzp978pfzrv6n9xhq5tvenl9e74pklmskh4xw6vxxyp3j8qkke3cezqyvhwumn8ghj76rzwghxxmmjv93kcefwwdhkx6tpdshsz9thwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjme0qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uqzpsgksenac2uj2xtn8wcyckcejvvwwgu0vllsdatawlh5fx0z5w5dy9fxu6

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Is my nostr keypair an SSI? Do I need to be cautious of something I'm unaware of?

SSI comes from the web3 world, and yeah, I think it's the same idea. I wrote about this a while ago in nostr terms: https://habla.news/u/hodlbod@coracle.social/1687802006398

The term "sovereign" feels not right. "Self-sovereign" feels even worse. What does that even mean?

"In-hand" or something like that sounds better to me.

I prefer the term "cryptographic identity", but it's also missing some aspects