Thanks nostr:npub1azrgrnlmutgxvvjnrtvsn6npm6a08vqz0n0k3k4kf226sv2n93ls4ajl96 🫡

I still think the reactive method shouldn’t be removed from the BIP. It’s a fallback if plan A fails, and I get the sense it’s the one that unsettles the bad actors the most.

nostr:nevent1qqsykd7h7pke9rm567gamca0uh9qjds5u4lc996qrrhz0a08z790m5spzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgevv2td

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I'd rather we didn't use that activation method if possible. Practically guaranteed chain split. Smooth planned upgrade is better.

I don’t think anyone wants that. It’s reserved for a worst case scenario.