I aint worried.
You havent even got argument other than name calling me. “Maxi”, “Cultists”, “Circle Jerker” and now “Fragile”.
It’s pretty clear you only have ad hominem attacks.
And I am politely asking you stop replying as you wasting my time because this conversation is going nowhere as you fail miserable to articulate any argument.
You failed to point out where I called you names.
If you don't want to keep arguing, this is an open protocol. No need to politely ask me to unfollow you.
You can just stop replying or if you feel particularly offended, mute me forever.
Glad I could help. I hope you keep an open mind and are willing to be challenged.
Here’s tip for you. If you trying to make an argument don’t start ad hominem attacks because it means you already lost. Attack the facts not characteristics no matter how “maxi”, “cult like”, “circle jerkers” or “fragile” they come across.
Again, God bless you! You need it.
There's no ad hominem because I'm not making any logical argument.
I'm making a SUBJECTIVE characterization of piling a much of common bitcoin twitter ghospel together as potentially cultist.
It's a personal opinion, not an argument. I'm sorry if it ofends you. You are obviously entitled to disagree.
So with you its your feelings over objective truth.
I dont care how you feel. Your feelings are none of my business.
I deal with the facts of the matter.
If you didn't care about my opinion you could have just ignored me and moved on.
In my original comment I explicitly said I don't disagree with any of your points in particular.
Your Logic: Replying to you comment means I care what you have to say.
Incorrect: I get personal satisfaction exposing the contradictions of the arguments you made. Thank you for that.
What contradictions did you expose?
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed