You might be right about the lengths they are willing to go to. History says they will try everything. Crises, fear campaigns, coercion, blame shifting. None of that would surprise me.
But here is the part I fundamentally disagree with. Winning is not defined by permission, convenience, or mass adoption on their timeline. It never has been.
Power only looks absolute until people stop complying. Every system that relied on total control collapsed the moment enough people routed around it. Bitcoin is not a product you ask permission to use. It is a network you opt into and build on, especially when things get uncomfortable.
If they shut down ramps, people build P2P. If they criminalize wallets, people hide keys. If they ban transactions, markets go underground. That is how every prohibition in history has ended. Not cleanly, not comfortably, but inevitably.
Fear is their strongest weapon. If everyone waits for perfect conditions, then yes, they win by default. But good people do not win by waiting. They win by preparing, adapting, and refusing to internalize defeat before the fight is even forced.
Bitcoin was not created for easy times. It was created for exactly the scenario you are describing. The question is not whether they will try. The question is whether enough people are willing to take responsibility instead of outsourcing their courage to the system they claim to distrust.
Living in fear and accepting loss ahead of time guarantees only one outcome. That is the only scenario where this cannot be won.