Replying to Avatar corndalorian

This is unironically the way to go. Only nerds that bother to learn the tools deserve freedom. Fuck mass adoption.

nostr:nevent1qqsx0pgepdant6dsvu8dzz0827ax6p0sc2gv2a5whu2lkav9zdkqqegpz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchsyg8cumryxsh3upfysp3suflpq9kuud0u8fs5uczrflh54gjsxv5v4ypsgqqqqqqsdjdte9

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

PoW

Nah this is cope imo, we built a clunky ass UX all running off of damus relay and call it freedom tech, kind of a fail

How is it cope if it works for you? Why do you need the other 7 billion tiktok zombies to feel accomplished?

There is a whole beautiful world out there outside of our Bitcoin echo chamber, it's not all zombies

We should want to attract artists and other content creators but instead we just cope and say it's fine with like 40 bitcoiners repeating mantras

And it basically doesn't work, most clients cannot find notes that aren't on the big relays, which is just Twitter all over again but with more steps and worse UX

Nothing prevents you from enjoying the world outside nostr, no need to forcefully bring everything inside it. Most of my time is spent outide.

Mass abstraction is also fine. Godspeed.

also this will naturally make things move slower and fuck up less which i think satoshi mentioned a couple times

We fuck up just the same 🤣🤣🤣

hahah I like this. I used to try orange pilling people. I sucked at it. Eventually I stopped talking about bitcoin altogether. The slower the adoption curve, the longer I have to stack.

wait are we talking about bitcoin, or nostr?

💯

Shooting for mass adoption typically ends up in the production of anti-features as seen in bluesky and Mastodon

nostr:nevent1qqs06unymgjqy7splvt2wqta6kdhlwm2lmy6rsx58y7a5cyx2et75kspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygxsm6lelvfda7qlg0tud9pfhduysy4vrexj65azqtdk4tr75j6xdspsgqqqqqqs88xxk2

Completely agree on fuck mass adoption (or I should say aiming for it) and meanwhile completely disagree on remaining lazy with UX. I'm a nerd and want beautiful easy to use tools

UX should be perfected by the people that willingly want to use a tool, not the potential mass adoption normies or the proverbial grandma.

Any reasonable product designer will target people who willingly want to use the tool first and try to make it easier for others on the fence.

It's certainly a nuanced discussion and there are tradeoffs. Is making it normie-friendly making it less effective as a freedom tool?

I'm trying my best to build freedom tech with the masses in mind (and even nerds deserve good UX)

Doesn't mean I care if the masses never arrive

nostr:note1l4exfk3yqfaqr7ck5uqhm4vm07ak4lkf58qdgwfamfsgv4jhafdqpl3rr8

We can do our best to make it available to everyone, but it is probably the case that many will not utilize it.