The key word is: competence
That’s it.
Meritocracy.
Period.
Can you do the job? Great? Better than everyone else that applies? Perfect.
Congrats, you have the job.
Not race, not sex, not identity.
Merit.
The key word is: competence
That’s it.
Meritocracy.
Period.
Can you do the job? Great? Better than everyone else that applies? Perfect.
Congrats, you have the job.
Not race, not sex, not identity.
Merit.
Okay 🕊️ The other vantage point is that the person whose deaf, 9 times out of 10, navigates society with more innate barriers; took more for them to get to that same interview in general.
Me, I’d bow out, knowing I could go 6 other places and get that same job.
I understand what you’re saying though and appreciate that you engaged in a way that was respectful while communicating your perspective.
" It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it."
-Upton Sinclair
She's an DEI "activist" that's probably been promoting Marxist identity politics her whole life. By now she's made a career out of it. Good luck getting anything but smarmy responses.
But for most jobs, it's not just about competency in the role. Agreed that there's a minimum threshold of competence required but after that aren't there other factors that weigh in, including diversity?
I was indifferent towards the topic of inclusivity, till I read about how being full-abled is temporary and we all are at certain points of time disabled due to age/injury & systems that are designed with inclusivity in mind (even a specific category of disability) are beneficial to many kinds of users, say text-to-speech applications.
I'm no DEI expert but allowing for people to participate in society fully as themselves seems like a good thing for the community at large.
Sure.
Inclusivity is good.
But not at the cost of others.
Enlarge the table.
DEI generally isn’t used to do that.
At times, there are going to be trade-offs but I wouldn't say that's always the case 🤷♀️ But I get where you're coming from
“Not always the case.” Sure. .01% of the time it’s “not always the case” that DEI is sexist and racist.
I’ll concede that.
If you mean that to be non-racist, non-sexist, we should completely ignore the systemic, historical challenges & prejudices that impact different races/ genders differently, then you and I prescribe to different definitions of racism/sexism.
I don't think I (ie a random stranger on the internet) can fully convince you otherwise ☮️
Cool man. If you’re for institutions endorsing sexism and racism more power to you.
It will not end well, we already see it collapsing.