I think it works now

nostr:note1eafx6rpdw2dkert0ngqs3yvsehwwlta3zqzwdp8jap06j0s79l0qglk7x2

But I’m not sure about the delayed processing, I have some code that handles that its never triggered because the response seems always status: “success”, not “processing”, I’m checking that first before checking “processing_url”

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

If I understand correctly, the spec forces me to return a 'succes' even in case of delayed processing, changing in this case the header to 202.