I got it

ability to choose

That’s my answer

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I like this definition.

I think that when a man can feel and emote, and also make healthy and functional choices and follow through with them, it is a good thing.

To mirror Victor Frankl, between stimulus and response is a choice, and in that space is the freedom to choose. And as a person makes choices and follows through with them relative to what's healthy, functional, and good ideas (because acting on good ideas generally produces a good life), they become more powerful and free to make new choices in their zone of proximal development.

Therefore, "the ability to choose" is a good answer.

Was a good question.

And you don’t have to think it, men do feel and emote. Robots don’t.

Interesting quote, I’m not familiar with that person. I’ll have to check them out.

I’m curious about “the Nature of Reality”. Would you be willing to DM me a chapter of your choice from the book? 1000 sats.

Sure, I'll find a chapter for you and once you DM me 1000 sats, I'll send it over.

nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqgdwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkcqpqlhezms58jx4yer60y3wzldc83fdez3j4rc4ue3edhz5qv3wxfsgql5et7h Please check your DMs for the link to Chapter 4 of my book The Nature of Reality. Thank you for your business!