Watch until the end, please. Judging this from the first 5 minutes is not fair and a waste of everyone's time.
Discussion
Giving a scammer a platform is a waste of everyone’s time.
Are you saying that he diverts from being a scammer after the first 5min? Because what I heard in those 5min was literally him reiterating the same scam talking points he has been spewing for nearly a decade (literally the same garbage 😂)
nostr:npub12qz56plzehejkyp4waaannmnny4y4c30j8q55a3wlk49haslga2snypdx8 if you say he diverges from that narrative, I will watch more of the interview. But I would still question why he spreads that misinformation
He has a different perspective but I think he is genuine in his opinion. That doesn't make him a scammer, it just makes him wrong.
The fork made me not put money into Bitcoin for years, because how can you know which one will go to 0 and which one will survive? I have a lot of regret obviously 🤣 and hate a scammer as much as the next person, but this is an interview worth listening to. I don't trust Saylor and think that Wall Street is going to want a chain that only works for banks. I hope we can do better.
They owned the domain bitcoin . com, and marketed their shitfork to people as “the real Bitcoin”, for YEARS after. How is that not a scam??
Easy: they really believe it.
I find that very hard to believe. But even if true, it doesn’t change the fact that it is a scam
You find that hard to believe that Roger really really thinks that small-blocker-conspiracy existed and exists? Seriously?
For me it is totally obvious that he really believes that.
I do believe that too btw… at least in a small extent.
I agree. The big blockers were censored on Reddit and Bitcoin Talk. This is well known. Blockstream was given $21 million to make sidechains, but instead they created a multisig and called it Liquid.
I think the conspiracy is that big blocks have no "use case". Of course they have a use case! They are just a terrible idea for L1, and should be an L2 drivechain.
Instead of admitting both sides are right and wrong about many things, they all double down on their nonsense. Divide and conquer.
Do I think that Roger still believes his idea to change Bitcoin was a good one? Sure. But that’s the beauty of Bitcoin, it doesn’t care about one actor with a bad idea.
Do I believe Roger believes it is morally ok to market BCash as “the real Bitcoin”, 7 years after the market rejected his idea? LMFAO absolute not. And if he does, he is by definition insane. This is the scam, regardless of his sanity.
Everyone is a scammer and Bitcoin doesn‘t care. 🤷🏼
I still think that interview was awesome and would recommend it to everyone who got orange-pilled in the early days and experienced the block-size war from its start till today.
Fair enough, I will try to find the courage to stomach the smug fart sniffing lies and give it a second try
