That was the plan exactly! I like self hosting and I don't like moving my nsec around, like at all. As you can see nip46 is on the roadmap. I just want the nip to evolve a bit more from where it's at. The first iteration will likely only be WS direct server for privacy reasons!

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Nice. How would you like nip46 to evolve?

I understand why relayed signer messages are useful for apps like amber and so on, but I believe it's a huge privacy (and security too) concern. I know we use initialization vectors in nip04 but I'm still not comfortable with the idea of privileged ciphertext data (with known formats) being hoovered by other sniffers. Basically I only want direct-to-signer connections, and at a minimum using nip44.

I shared my concerns on the nip repo a little while ago and I've settled until I can think of something better

https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/issues/1207