maybe readers will vote with their sats? 🤷‍♂️
Discussion
Sensitive topics would just be bought?
I don’t think sats work for this;
You can’t vote with sats because that demands a central coordinator.
I think sats here are an abstraction that introduces more complexity/noise than solutions.
What if we had fact-checking agencies managing it?
Maybe we could have an AI deciding what is truth and what isn't and it would only display you the truth.
Or perhaps a peer-review process that involves scientists that exchange approvals for sex favors and open publications that get government funding for the advancement of human knowledge but charge $200 for anyone to read.
