Monero miners got paid pennies & your transactions are at risk of getting deanoned as your real anon set isn't what's been marketed.
You'll see in the next hardfork for Monero, the number of rings will be expanded & the fee structure will be changed (again).
This is an attack, enough with the dishonesty.
nobody has ever lied about how many decoys are present in ring signatures. it was announced over and over again. quit being a twat.
>noo you can't just increase the anon set! hardforks are le bad
again, nobody says you can't flood the network with valid transactions. go ahead and do it.
You're being marketed ring size of 16, but in reality you're getting 4-5.
This is why you guys are changing it again, bc you got it wrong last time.
As for the spam, it's a real issue & that is why they want to change the fee structure again, bc you got it wrong last time.
You have no idea how many daily txs are spam aiming at that ring size of 4.
You only have ~25k daily transactions, that's an easy target unless the fee structure is addressed.
Rings won't expand because they won't exist. They're being replaced with cryptographic accumulators. And you can't deanon those with spam.
But I'm guessing you'll have an issue that it addressed your criticism with a hardfork. Damned if we do or don't.
Youre literally admitting here that your chain is currently not in working order.
Lol.
It's a well known and understood weakness that has always been publicly communicated. It's not that it breaks security guarantees. If you are a person under threat by government forces you need to take extra steps like self-spends aka churning and other opsec relevant precautions.
"not in working order" is exaggerated. Sender privacy is not in the most ideal state possible.
Amount and receiver unaffected.
It's still better than 99.9% of cryptocurrencies.
You don't even need a spam attack to deanon Bitcoin. That comes built in by default.
