Nick Fuentes using a bullhorn outside the Capitol, urging everyone to storm the building on January 6, 2021.
"Break down the barriers and disregard the Police!!"
Does anyone wonder how he escaped prosecution while hundreds of others were imprisoned?!?
Heās a paid agitator.
š§”šš»š»
ā”ļøā”ļøā”ļøreposts that reply hereā”ļøā”ļøā”ļø
https://blossom.primal.net/e162abfdb0a9683c9f9c6d6a99630773ae4d0df074953153678cd3a089bfdeeb.mov
šÆ
There are many of them. I'm afraid the US wrote this playbook to change govts it didn't like in all sorts of places. Ukraine anyone...
š Incentive to drop Charlie, then scrawl bullshit on (2 too many) bullet casings now hits different. This should be everywhere.
He is definitely a paid agitator. Supposedly the most cancelled man in the world, while also being the most influential. Like saying war is peace lol
šÆ
LFG š¤
Have you watched his show America First?
Just clips here or there when heās dropping nbombs.
Heās gotten such a bad rap over the years which makes sense b/c of his America First stance + his clips are always taken out of context. So I had to listen to him -my opinion has completely changed.
His show is very informative and to be honest, Iāve learned a lot, especially about the Middle East (as a veteran, I appreciate his take). I donāt agree with all his talking points, but the young kid is bright and wonāt be going away anytime soon.
Give his show a listen, not just the clips, and who knows, your opinion might change.
I just see clips of him dropping nig bombs.m lately and then this.
Jones and Schroyer, there were many right wingers there that day
Why some arrested? Some not?
AND
Obvious inciting from Fuentes and wasnāt charged? While Other people who just walked around spent 3 years in jail.
Doesnāt add up.
Donāt get me started on Jan 6! It was the event that red pilled me.
How so, what shifted for you?
I'm genuinely curious about peoples 'wake up' moments
A video called āEverything Wrong With The Capitol Shooting in 21 Minutesā by someone named Wooz News. He vanished after it went viral, and it got largely scrubbed from the internet for a long time. I realized it was made by someone who works as an editor or assistant editor in the business, and his analysis was spot on.
Whoever the guy is they have playing him since his return is not the same guy.
Yea I think I saw that one. Basically everyone in the aftermath of the "shooting" is standing around acting like they're doing "medical looking things" cause they think its all for still photos and not video?
Yeah and the glass was fake. That detail did me in. Thereās no possible explanation for fake glass in windows at the capitol if the event isnāt entirely theater.
Once I accepted that a fake riot and shooting could be staged at the capitol building, I realized they can fake absolutely anything and people will believe it.
yeah, more and more I view it all as a show
Would really love your specifically on the Charlie Kirk episode. Brokered deal to retire from Israeli propaganda front and sidestep the genocide issue?
I think they really shot him but I don't trust any particular theory of who "they" is just yet
The whole "Vallhalla" thing is suggestive of him not being dead but I don't really trust the "revelation of the method" line of thinking either; I think there's no reason for them to drop that as a clue/confession
But yeah, many anomalies - George Zinn, Valhalla, discrepancies in the official trantifa narrative. I don't know what to make of it
I smelled a rat immediately when with the first shot to hit the internet had an absolutely uncannily timed zoom in and then zoom out (?!). I detect a VFX blood gag with a very fast track (and what appears to be AI slop) in the close up video. Then all the footage of old men being detained being crystal clear but all footage of the death being highly compressed? It became too much to ignore.
Then his wife and best friend (Candace) have just NOT acted like he is actually dead, all kinds of examples of strange comments and tonally off, especially the wife. Big smiles all through her speech.
The āCharlie could no longer carry water for Israelā narrative Candace and others have been laying out makes me think he brokered some kind of deal with his big donors to step down/aside from public spotlight in spectacular fashion
Thatās my working means/motive/opportunity
Of course that makes me sound insane but itās genuinely what my mind finds most plausible.
If he was really dead and the wife is smiling like that, she had him killed. But the videos donāt show a man getting murdered at all, they show really advanced AI doctoring IMHO
Not that you asked for my take, and you shouldnāt be surprised, because I am Mr. Clownworld š
Yeah, I'm looking it at from a rationalist "what events have happened" perspective
You're much more sensitive to the fine details of presentation than I am
People think Iām a crazy person but I donāt know what the point of carefully studying how videos are made for the last 20 years is if Iām not willing to trust my own analysis of how a particular video was most likely made
š«”š«
Done š¤
š§”š
š«”
Yeah š¤
šš§”
š«”š„
ā š
Right
ā š«”
š
š«”
š¤š«āØ
Done ā
š«
Already š¤
I did š«
š¤”
ā¤ļøāš„š
Whoever pays/protects him, is likely who set up Charlie Kirks assassination.
"Cui Bono"
š»
Exactly. āWho benefitsā
done
Done, Sir
Hmm. Who do you think is paying him?
Deep state. That could be Israel, could by CIA, Soros who knowsā¦
True ā
If you or I did that we would be locked up no chance of parole & made an example out of to the public for inciting violence. We'd probably get life.
āØš¤
š«”
I hope that you kept the receipt for that bullshit that you bought. If you did, share them.
What i buy? š¤
āI just saw a clip of Nick Fuentes clearly inciting an insurrection in the same fashion that paid FBI informants were proved to be doing.
at a certain point you have to stop conspiratizing everything and deal with the ideas.
Why wasnt he charged? Give me a single rational explanation.
because he didn't go into the capital?
Grok:
1. How many January 6 defendants spent time in prison?
- ~700ā750 people were sentenced to incarceration (prison or jail time). This includes those convicted of nonviolent entry (often short sentences, ~60 days) and violent offenses (up to 22 years).
2. How many were charged but did not enter restricted areas?
- ~150ā400 defendants were charged but not specifically for entering the Capitol or restricted grounds.
- Total charged: ~1,570ā1,583.
- Charged with entering restricted areas: ~1,186ā1,417.
- Difference (~150ā400) includes those charged for actions outside the Capitol (e.g., planning, incitement, or aiding without physical entry).
Notes: Data comes from DOJ records and reports (e.g., PBS, NPR). Most convictions (~99%) were via guilty pleas. All convictions were pardoned or commuted on January 20, 2025, except for 14 commuted sentences.
There where probably lots of people that entered and didn't get charged. Shotgun enforcement by on the ground officers. I don't think this has the implications your saying it does. What about nicks message do you find that glows?
"Break down the barriers and disregard the Police!!" <āāļøāļøāļø
There were people charged that werenāt even there that day.
Fishy
Grok:
1. How many January 6 defendants were charged but weren't physically at the event?
- Approximately 100ā150 people were charged for involvement without being physically present at the Capitol on January 6, 2021. These cases typically involved remote actions like online planning, incitement, threats, or aiding/abetting from afar (e.g., conspiracy charges under 18 U.S.C. Ā§ 371 or threats against officials).
- Examples include individuals coordinating via social media or phone without traveling to D.C., such as some associates of extremist groups who helped organize but stayed home.
- Total charged: ~1,570ā1,583. Most (~98ā99%) were for on-site actions (e.g., ~1,417 for entering restricted areas or ~608 for assaulting officers). The remainder (100ā150) fits remote roles, based on DOJ breakdowns and analyses excluding physical presence.
Notes: Data from U.S. Department of Justice updates, NPR's case database, and Wikipedia summaries of proceedings. All cases were pardoned or dismissed post-2025, but figures reflect pre-pardon status. Exact remote counts aren't officially tallied, but estimates derive from charge distributions (e.g., non-entry/non-assault felonies).
Yeah but how many Patriot Front Members were there!!! Probably a few :)
Was there ever ANY video of the trials or from prison? Could have just been a bunch of paper nonsense. Wouldnāt be the first trial?
You ever been down Waco? The granddaddy of staged events since the Cold War
*wouldnāt be the first fake trial
Why do you use grok?
He was subpoenaed by the House Select Committee investigating Jan. 6.
In January 2022, the Committee issued subpoenas to Nick Fuentes (and Patrick Casey) over their promotion of election-fraud conspiracy theories, their role in planning pro-Trump rallies that preceded the Capitol attack, and large Bitcoin donations they received prior to Jan. 6. (Sources: VICE, Business Insider, Politico)
The subpoena asked whether the funds they got were tied to organizing or facilitating events related to Jan. 6. (Source: Business Insider)
He was on Capitol grounds that day.
Fuentes did not enter the Capitol building as far as public evidence indicatesāhe was present outside, on the grounds. (Sources: Wikipedia, Politico)
He celebrated the attack afterward.
For example, he tweeted: āThe Capitol Siege was fucking awesome and Iām not going to pretend it wasnāt.ā (Sources: Just Security, VICE)
He remains under investigation.
According to reports, Fuentes is under scrutiny by the FBI and/or DOJ regarding whether the Bitcoin donations he received were tied to illegal activities connected to Jan. 6 or its lead-up. (Source: Business Insider)
The Jan. 6 Committee has also described that his assets and he remain under investigation.
nostr:npub1qqvt0m3nlvjnssmrn33w9yh7cuq2dx5nkz8wxax9hk5hrjdnj4jqz8cn3w
https://x.com/shynafo/status/1967294335684395232
This is helpful to understand if you want to take the time.
š»
This is very wrongā¦ women really shouldnāt try to explain menās motives.
Stupid. Just talk to the people in question. No one mentioned is that extreme, and the number of the actual white supremacists (which barely existed in the 90s before the diversity obsession) is quite low (never mind the 1/2 that are Feds or assets themselves).
š¤š«š§”
He was probably right, given what we know now. Our Congress is beyond corruption, both sides.
If heās right or wrong isnāt my point.
I totally do agree with you.
Itās very strange that his participation was not punished.
Why is that?
If we donāt recognize how much of this is orchestrated from the govt itself, weāre lost and confused and unable to defend against it.
š§”šš»š»
Glenn Greenwald did a short segment on Nick Fuentes recently and why he was so pissed that Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson had implied that he was an asset/controlled opposition (? I think I'm remembering that right).
I know almost nothing about him and did not realize that he was at J6. No repercussions for him for that, I guess?
Iāll take a look at that. Thx!
I was unaware of Fuentes until recently.
I think the gist of it was that he (Fuentes) came out against Israel's influence over US politicians years ago when both Tucker and Candace were still very pro-Israel. He was de-banked, censored, etc, and none of the current America First folks lifted a finger to help. Now they've finally come around to that perspective and are accusing him of being an asset.
Its all So complicated. Its like thereās a power struggle on both side with Fuentes is like the far right racist pushing for civil war and horrifying to someone like me thats conservative but no problem with classical liberalism.
I listened to greenwald. Im open to the idea that the same force just opted not to go after Fuentes because heās destructive to the right.
āor at least, an accelerant to civil war.
Didnāt he almost get clapped?
Potentially. There are numerous foreign entities (likely along with the CIA and other such āinstitutionsā in the country) who desire civil war in America or flinging America into a losing world war in Asia.
We are being led by traitors and if we donāt seize back control, we all be immiserated beyond our wildest imaginationsā¦
Heās pissed because if people buy into that, that equates to zero credibility for anyone on the deep left or deep right.
Everyone on both extremes despises Feds (theyāre not wrong).
Excellent point, and noticing.
I can't stand Nick Fuentes, I have no idea why people actually follow the little twerp.
Agitators often serve unseen masters.
Maybe, but why didnāt he agitate this week then? He gave a sermon on suffering for Christ & rejecting vengeance the next day. Seems like a blown opportunity if heās being utilized in this way.
