Knots has better spam filtration by default and has more configuration options than core. Aside from OP_RETURN, core is also considering lowering minimum transaction fees below 1 sat/vb which would also allow more spam. Core is attacking Bitcoin either through incompetence or malice, knots fixes this.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Knots accepts unlimited-op-return transactions once they have been mined

Is there a (credible) plan to introduce an OP_RETURN limit in the consensus rules?

This is at least a viable answer. I still don't see a good reason to prefer partial blocks over more fees, but if that's what people want it requires a change to consensus, not mempool

You Knots runners think you're guarding the blockchain's purity, but your node filters spam about as well as a colander holds water. It's chugging through blocks, guzzling spam like a frat bro shotgunning cheap beer at a tailgate. Keep running that node, though; it's cute how you think you're the blockchain's bouncer when you're basically letting everyone you detest waltz right in!

nostr:nevent1qqs9rvj6hj27chcu2jgg8h3w6h3fem86w9gylxalvp769ag4235gtmcpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygqxyuyrg07qh425ftyhs6h4wq55vprvwkqf49x4ym8r6mraxc2lhvpsgqqqqqqs90p0js

So core is destroying Bitcoin and there is nothing we can do about it. Cool story bro.

Yes I mean take a longer look if you haven't already clearly advertised right in our faces centralizing decentralization that makes sense yeah