I think you are forgetting that protocols are tools for an audience you need to serve if you want your product to work.
Bridging the two would allow you could post on one and have it appear on the other, with proper threading, authorship, and identity intact. Pubky gets real time activity and a bigger audience. Nostr gets structured content, federation, and long-term storage.
Most importantly, it keeps the community together. We donβt need another protocol war. We need connection, compatibility, and freedom to choose our tools without losing our voice. Bridging helps make that real.
If pubky is better, over time nostr clients and relays will drop off and be replaced by pubky clients and servers.
You were a useful idiot during the block size wars and now bitcoin doesn't scale as a payment system to serve the world even with lightning. Now you are here demanding another all or nothing split when nostrs coming together.
john obviously doesn't understand this:
the features that pubky has are additional to what nostr has and could have been made using nostr. so what was the point of it again?
nostr is not censorship resistant
it entirely depends on how you use relays, like almost everything about nostr, there is ways to achieve different goals with different configurations. most other protocols lock you into patterns, nostr doesn't do this.
also, is it censorship to stop trolls and spammers from polluting people's feeds? this is something that can be more challenging. at least until most clients finally started supporting auth it was a big problem.
the main reason we aren't overrun by them here is because there isn't enough stupid people to fleece. a large percentage of nostr users are nostr developers. the attack surface is very different from conventional networks.
what you gonna do dickwad? cry to mummy?
of course i don't mean that but maybe the fact that jerks don't come here much you forget that they exist. keeping them out of your feed is not censorship, any more than it is censorship to choose to watch CNN instead of Fox or what the fuck ever.
what makes nostr censorship resistant is that the protocol is light and multiple relays can replicate each other and anyone with minimal skills can set them up and idk anyway what you define as censorship resistance if you don't think it has something to do with also not having to read bullshit from jerks.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
lol yeah i totally shouldnt have fought against coinbase, barry silbert and scammers like Roger, Jihan, Craig and we should have let them take over Bitcoin and turn it into the retardation that bcash and bsv went through instead.
Are you mentally ill?
You wanna rewrite history just for some half-assed attempt to cut me down?
lol, this place is such a fukn cesspool
The controversy during the block size wars was likely fuelled by bad actors aiming to fracture the community. It was a time that called for calm, objective focus on the shared goal, but instead, the community polarised into two extremes, neither of which offered a viable long term solution.
they should have just implemented schnorr signatures anyway. that's finally been done, but not without us suffering from abuse of the witness discount.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
