I think nostr is nothing but a large group following rough consensus.

so far we've agreed upon signing messages with secp256k1, this is fundamental.

Next we agreed upon the structure of our messages, note the signatures still stand even if our agreement on the signatures broke.

Next we agreed upon relaying these messages through websockets over to relays, note the structure and signature still work even if we chose to ignore the relaying mechanism.

I think it is this resilience the fact that I would still know its calle even if you ignored everything else and signed your message on paper and sent it through a peacock.

This is what makes nostr special, we agree upon stuff that works. Thats all that matters. That it works.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I meant a pigeon* but what I really should have said was an ostrich πŸ˜‚

Dude…. I laughed so hard about peacock that I cried

What are these carrier peacocks you speak of?

It’s honestly a magnificent experience

Carrier Peacocks is my new band name!

Honestly, this is the single thing that keeps me as a part of this

That I have def agreed to signing with secp256k1

nostr:nevent1qqsp3p6ha2t98zshr58qk525m8zxun33vpfyjc44s447xavynux9mtcpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqwpxjpk

> Next we agreed upon the structure of our messages [...] Next we agreed upon relaying these messages through websockets over to relays

we haven't lol

some of us still think that we will need to move to a binary format for everything... plus json and websockets are a bad idea, I still think relays should listen to standard TCP (and perhaps even UDP) sockets.

but I agree with your overall message

It really doesn't matter

Notes and other stuff transmitted via peacock.