Light doesn't bend. Space itself bends.
Discussion
Traveling without moving...
Let's pull-request elon :)
Extreme left:
- Equal chances for all human.
- And we could use new wording to have explicit inclusion of woman in our language.
Extreme right:
- White supremacy!
- Race theory and theories from some bible teologist should be thought in school instead of scientific methods.
- Shorten spending in public education, to establish knowledge to be a privilege to rich again.
- Tax the poor.
- Empower supressed sexist
- Distroy separation of power (executive eats legislative and judicative)
The problem with the left isn't their goals. It's how they attempt to achieve them. Censorship, blackballing, blackmail and if given the chance concentration camps, secret police, Hitler youth, etc. These things are as bad or worse than white supremacy, sexism, etc.
The most successful political route by far is enabling the most freedom for the most people possible. I think most Americans agree on this. Their problem is the method. You can't achieve freedom through repression of any kind.
In small party I agree with you. Not accepting other opinions is not cool. But this is not a leftist thing. It is a problem with the extremes. I mean we have all seen the wording-policies Trump is enforcing.
I prefer having a differenciation between solution oriented people and populist. It does not really matter in which party or what direction someone is headed.
It is important, that politicians are transparent about their goals, ideas how to achieve these goals and to follow them in a way to search for common grounds. Look to find consensus above the party they are in. Such people can help our society to stabilize.
And rather call out specific actions, then trying to attack a whole group orparty. Since when we disqualify censoring speech, then we can fix something. Biggest threat to it is currently the US government. Even when they try to point fingers on every other country in the world. They do it on purpose, so the population is not watching their actions.
Their goal is extortion and forcing me to pay for other people’s healthcare so it’s not a good goal either regardless of method
Are you part of the richest 10% in your country?
No but I still pay for your socialist dreams with inflation. Bitcoin will end your scam once and for all.
Move to Cuba and see how much healthcare you get
No you do not. You pay protection of wealth, education for flourishing companies and the wealthiest are not taking part in the paying part in the same amount as you and me do it. But wealthy people have an easy game to get reach with their word. And they try to convince everyone, that our poor and middleclass friends are the problem, so we do not waist our time all with small difficulties instead of seeing the big unjustified reality.
Why do you faggots only complain about “rich” people?
I don’t pay taxes to rich people.
I pay taxes to government.
The government fails in everything it does, it has never succeeded in anything long term. This is because politicians are not useful people, they don’t understand peace and minding their own business.
The solution is less government not more
Also where do you live? You can move to Cuba or Venezuela today! Make your socialist dream come true!
Fuck you
Any society based on theft is a failure, I wouldn't even call society.
Rich in what? Most people fiat rich are indeed very lonely and poor in many things. Some very rich people life ascetic lives. Some ppoor people live hedonistic lives on credit card debt others are humbly caring for heir families and communities by working 16 hours a day.
The human experience is vast and poor does not need to mean poor, like rich does not mean rich. Some cavemen (they still exist) couldn't be more happy.
It's complicated.
What is not complicated is that theft is not a good starting point for any relationship. A relationship based on voluntary interaction bears more fruits and it invites different qualities of different people poor or rich to the same table.
What we see is theft on a grand scale and a massive defense against it. It's alla huge waste of human ingenuity and energy.
How I see it:
People, that empower loyal people are improving the problem of corruption.
It is not important, if taxes are cut. The only important thing is who pays the taxes and who profits from them. As long as there is government spending, someone will pay taxes.
https://www.usaspending.gov/explorer/agency
30.9% Healthcare: Personal Health -> good energy -> high productive potential -> great economy -> flourishing companies
16.4% Department of Defense: Stability and defense of property -> Who has more, profits more from these spending. Every poor person can migrate anytime. They have nothing to loose. Rich people have companies, houses and land. All these assets can not move therefore they have to be defended.
15.8% Social security: Every worker profits, since it helps stabilize income over his lifetime. It gives security during illness, accidents and when older and the body does not have the ability to be as productive anymore.
36.9% rest: The rest I do not understand in detail. But lets assume every person profits equally from it.
Based on these government spending, I think it is reasonable, when the first 47.3% should be payed progressively, means more income results in higher percentage to pay. Since increased monetary wealth increases the need for these spending.
15.8% by all working people, to have insurance. (open to discuss what level of insurance is obligatory)
And the rest 36.9% would be split equally on the income. (everyone pays the same percentage on their income.
WHO WILL CONTROL THE TAXES?
When the “rich” people pay the taxes to other ‘rich’ people?
THIS IS ALREADY HAPPENING SO WHY HAVEN’T YOU SOLVED ALL THE PROBLEMS YET?
It is impossible to steal money from people (taxes) and also help them!
It's the anti-Western anti-Whites (who are not restricted to the "left" -- many are also on the "right") who have suppressed science and history, ruining the lives of, and even jailing, those who have views which dissent from their looney-tunes narrative. For example, historian David Irving was jailed for historical opinions arrived at after a lifetime of research; and James Watson, one of the greatest scientists of our time was stripped of his job and honors because he concluded (quite reasonably) that the human races are not equal. None of this has anything to do with the Bible, which I am pretty sure that neither Irving nor Watson takes seriously.
That is a plane where you still accept the violent monopolistic power of the state, no matter where you place yourself along the line.
The only winning move is refusing to accept the state as even a thing, and just mind your own business.
Reality is hard. You can't just refuse to accept the state. Whatever they do will always affect us. This is a forever battle. If you step away, you lose. Regardless of who you are or how much you have.