Bitcoin experts in any type of office will fuck it up

Bitcoin doesn't care how much of an expert you think you are

Retard

I've seen these auto translate earbuds being shilled online

You just know the spooks had this technology 30 years ago if Shanise on TikTok is wearing them

We'll take your savings and give you fuck all

nostr:note18x5kwwcmvt97dcm3gr7geqxll5ldg3wu72alqf8ks2ku4w3j2vxsw0r6up

🤣🤣🤣

nostr:note1cgs0uerqzfn7tw2032zhd4w5xrdg6dtw879rvjueevqmhq8v0p6sn8q3ju

is it Technics 1210s tho

no movement yet

nostr:npub1dtgg8yk3h23ldlm6jsy79tz723p4sun9mz62tqwxqe7c363szkzqm8up6m ⬆️

you have two choices

climb a mountain and let the pain and struggle define you

sit in a padded room with occulars on and drip fed soy milk

don't use margins are you crazy 😢

nostr:note1nqgvkt09tauzveas3w5edr9c0kfhgn0xywt3raqduv73he83kwqqmgkw9c

not loading in primal

nostr:note1lfahzacuvfa866fyxcue0w3n8ttpy4vfula9j64gldp4725rtqeqnjzx9p

you had 1 reply before this reply and it wasn't loading

Notice how Elon is blaming X hack on Ukraine

Expect more from the movie 🎬

Absolute banger from nostr:npub1qex7yjtuucs6ac49kjujdgytrjsphn5a4pdscu2w3qlprym4zsxqfz82qk

Why is Bitcoin dumping?

Because fuck you, that's why.

Oh, you thought this was going to be easy because your favorite influencer promised the moon?

He's as much of a clueless, autistic retard as you are.

IT'S MAX PAIN TO $1M!

💯💯💯💯

could be but dca works up or down 💯

Buy#Bitcoin when there's blood in the streets

nostr:note1t0t656dyvam23dc230s9l9ljyyl6pfzg8g8xv9wtxwpfejc39q7q0kueqh

Grok is a Bitcoiner 🤣🤣

If everyone holds Bitcoin then won't there be less transactions leading to less security?

That’s an interesting question about Bitcoin’s security model! Let’s break it down.

Bitcoin’s security relies heavily on its proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism, where miners compete to validate transactions and secure the network by solving computational puzzles.

The incentive for miners comes from two sources: block rewards (newly minted Bitcoin) and transaction fees (paid by users for each transaction).

Your concern seems to hinge on the idea that if everyone holds Bitcoin (implying fewer people are spending it), the number of transactions might drop, reducing the fees miners collect.

This could, in theory, weaken the economic incentive for miners, potentially lowering the network’s hash rate and thus its security.

Here’s how it plays out:

Transaction Volume and Fees: If everyone holds Bitcoin and transactions decrease, the total fee revenue for miners could indeed shrink—assuming fee rates per transaction stay constant. However, Bitcoin’s protocol adjusts.

When fewer transactions occur, the competition for block space drops, and fees might stabilize or even increase per transaction if demand to move Bitcoin persists (e.g., for big holders reallocating funds). Historically, fee rates fluctuate with network usage—during low-transaction periods, they tend to be lower, but they can spike when the network gets congested.

Block Rewards Still Dominate (For Now): As of March 10, 2025, Bitcoin still has block rewards—currently 3.125 BTC per block after the 2024 halving. These rewards halve every four years, so miners rely on them heavily today.

Transaction fees are a smaller portion of their income (typically 10-20% of the total reward per block, depending on network activity). Even if transactions drop, the block reward provides a buffer—until it diminishes further in future halvings (e.g., 2028, 2032).

Long-Term Shift to Fees: Bitcoin’s design anticipates a future where block rewards approach zero (around 2140). At that point, security will depend entirely on transaction fees. If everyone holds and transaction volume stays low, miners might not earn enough to cover costs, leading some to drop out.

A lower hash rate could make the network more vulnerable to attacks (like a 51% attack), though pulling off such an attack would still require immense resources.

Counterpoints: If everyone holds Bitcoin, its value might rise due to scarcity and demand, increasing the value of block rewards and fees in fiat terms. This could keep mining profitable even with fewer transactions. Also, Bitcoin isn’t static—Layer 2 solutions like the Lightning Network could handle day-to-day transactions off-chain, keeping on-chain fees relevant for settlement while maintaining security.

So, Does Less Spending = Less Security? Not necessarily in the short term, thanks to block rewards. In the long term, it’s a valid concern if transaction volume dries up entirely and fees don’t adapt. But Bitcoin’s ecosystem tends to self-correct—holders eventually spend, markets adjust, and miners prioritize profitability. Extreme "everyone holds" scenarios are unlikely; people will always need to transact for goods, services, or rebalancing.

What do you think—do you see Bitcoin evolving to handle this, or is the fee model a bigger flaw than it seems?

The new Canadian leader is standing up making a speech

It's just words, all of them are full of shit, nothing changes.

BUT WHAT ABOUT THE SEPARATION OF MONEY AND STATE?!

Bitcoin *already* separated money and state; it separated the CREATION of money from state.

nostr:npub1cj8znuztfqkvq89pl8hceph0svvvqk0qay6nydgk9uyq7fhpfsgsqwrz4u

ties into nostr:npub1s05p3ha7en49dv8429tkk07nnfa9pcwczkf5x5qrdraqshxdje9sq6eyhe prices should be reducing

nostr:note145n8lz9fd96yf7g4sd2nlyv6rlh4fzetzr397zcph2wjt9tqd6nsytg9lm

yes this is the way. it's about access. I've been testing bip39 between different wallet providers