i see - so its a bandwidth issue for sending the zaps, not an event signature verification issue. im asking b/c the latter can be efficiently amortized w schnorr
is it b/c of sig verification overhead? or something else?
amazing!
how much memory does the relay need in order to store all user/event data?
in a situation where someone new joins the network/relay, won't they have to verify a lot of signatures of past events?
shouldnt this make it very computationally intensive to trustlessly join a relay when the network scales up?
That makes sense!
I was actually wondering whether its enough to batch Schnorr verify every N events to resolve performance issues on low-end hw. Strikes me as simpler (or are we doing this already?)
signal uses double rachet