Arguing eth vs btc is just like arguing random stock vs btc from a bitcoiner perspective. What if someone told you a random penny stock had a greater return? Only real response here seems to be “congratulations” (alternatively: I can’t predict lottery numbers)
Another subsidy for kicking the can down the road and increase asset prices for those who already have the most
Why is your personal preference relevant to the issue? If he wants to he should be allowed. It’s idiotic to censor it
For the rare occasion that I drink alcohol, either old red wine or negroni if it’s summer.
He’s one of the very biggest winners of the fiat everything bubble economy, maybe the biggest. He will never get it, because getting it means that the system that made him the world’s richest man is unfairly rigged in his favor.
Devil’s advocate: Zaps are asymmetric for rich vs poor. For some the value of a zap would be high, for others neglible. For wealthy or high-follower accts (which is somewhat correlated), reputational cost of liking is far higher than cost of zapping.