Let me bury this deep here where no one will see anyway. But I think nostr as is will die, it'll be abandoned (except for me, I'll be wondering around larping post-apoc kicking over empty filing cabinets looking for pills). And then someone will remember it, perhaps someone with a large following, they'll come along and set up a home here, like a weird wasteland guru. :)

The spectre of jungle haunts the UK, welcome to my Wire article

Yeah, I suppose it's not 'groindbreaking' or whatever you want to call it, music reviewers loved it cos they could jerk off to words like hauntology. It's not really a surprise that it was a mini moment, cos where does this sort of revisiting/referntial sound go? I still revisit it from time to time tho.

There's also definitely the ed rush &optical and ray Keith signature sounds which especially UK producers can't seem to shake off. Which is great lol

Woke up like this too, ay?

Thank you. I have just learned a little about Louis Wain.😺

I read this note of yours early this morning and having just finished watching the documentary I linked, in another note, on the history of modern street art, I would love to simply shout "Bitcoin fixes this" but......

Facetiousness aside, perhaps after I read the palladium article fully I'll have some thoughts to share. If you haven't seen that Street Art documentary it explores and touches on the issues in your note.

This is from a very good article on the current state of the art world and deepish dive into the historical circumstances which led to this point. However, I strongly disagree with the author's frankly ridiculous statement that the art market is not to blame for the situation when everything he carelessly describes as "art" only exists within the narrow and corrupt confines of the elite galleries and institutions. It's like claiming the shitcoin market had nothing to do with the rise of FTX.

There is a lot of great art being bought and sold in the four and low-five figure range by honest and passionate people. What the public is sold as the "art world" has nothing at all to do with this and most people intuitively understand that what they're selling is not art, no matter how hard the media tries to gaslight them into accepting it.

This is from a very good article on the current state of the art world and deepish dive into the historical circumstances which led to this point. However, I strongly disagree with the author's frankly ridiculous statement that the art market is not to blame for the situation when everything he carelessly describes as "art" only exists within the narrow and corrupt confines of the elite galleries and institutions. It's like claiming the shitcoin market had nothing to do with the rise of FTX.

There is a lot of great art being bought and sold in the four and low-five figure range by honest and passionate people. What the public is sold as the "art world" has nothing at all to do with this and most people intuitively understand that what they're selling is not art, no matter how hard the media tries to gaslight them into accepting it.

To put a number on it.

How much was Tucker worth to Fox, you ask? For reference, the dip last Wednesday followed the announcement they'd settled out of court with Dominion for nearly $800 billion.

Once again, a dissident financial commentator describes the people running the system as "dumb." This line of thinking never ceases to amaze me. They're not dumb, they're evil and corrupt and the reason they keep pursuing policies that will make things worse is because they're all looting the casino as it goes bust.

Even guys like Schiff don't want to face up to the fact that things are even worse than thought.

#[0]