My daily driver is a kind 1 client today. Explain.

Yes this.

It’s like superstition, but even more. Don’t just carry around a rabbits foot, carry a rabbit. Don’t just throw a little salt over your shoulder, throw the whole shaker.

Your chart should start at zero friend.

Well done sir

🤣 I just spent 10 minutes scrolling my feed thinking the signal was above average, before realizing I was scrolling my bookmarks.

Self guided tour.

self guided tours are not orchestrated, they are self guided.

To the Trump voters, congrats. The dragon was dispatched, you did it. Now please return to being skeptical of the government. Don’t become emotionally invested in your choice, just because you put them in office doesn’t mean you need to support every action they do. You need your objectivity. You don’t need to defend them. You made a decision at a moment in time based on the information you had, not a lifetime commitment. They will have some dumb ideas, the rest of us need you to call ‘balls and strikes’ not be a cheerleader for “Team Red”

To the Kamala supporters, you lost. Better luck next time. Please don’t embarrass yourselves contorting your perceptions trying to desperately keep hope alive for your candidate with claims of voter fraud or refuse to live in the observable reality.

I understand he had his appeal chance and the Supreme Court denied hearing it, letting the appeal stand. I have not read the appeal judgements, but a judge sentencing that includes “facts” that were not established by the jury of his peers, is the problem. You are found guilty of X, you were not found guilty of Y, your sentence is what it is because you did Y, So says the prosecution who did not charge it or did not meet the evidentiary threshold to persuade a jury. None the less the judge includes that as a fact established. But he didn’t wave his right to a jury trial did he? So who established that fact? Juries are supposed to establish the facts of a case. Justice served? Seems like no to me so far.

My greatest fear is coming true guys. It looks like one of them is going to win. #elections #politics

Certainly true. But to push it abit, if acorns are good to eat for the squirrel because they plant 20% for new seedlings and seeds are good for birds because some of the seeds consumed are distributed as they pass through their system, so there was co-evolution, aren’t these seeds that humans are propagating in seed oils successful from an evolutionary perspective, aren’t humans distributing the seeds through agriculture. The deer doesn’t want to be eaten either by the wolf or the human. I’m just saying the food that is good for a species is more dependent on the species evolving to consume it rather than the consumed species getting a benefit from it such that they allow itself to be consumed for the benefit.

Cool but you missed 🥧

I’ll continue the question, honestly asking. ‘Seeds contain anti nutrients because the plant doesn’t want us to eat their babies’ The answer has to be more than just that though, because plants don’t want birds eating their babies either. But we wouldn’t say that birds that eat seeds are poisoned by them would we? It has to mostly be that since we aren’t evolved to eat them we cannot process them or similar. Right?

Remember back when people were claiming bird flu was going to be used to disrupt standard election procedures? Huh I guess that didn’t happen.

Good work, keep seeking out alternative viewpoints.

The candy is already smaller due to inflation, the move would be to bring out a candy bar from two decades ago😅

Watch All the episodes of startrek where something goes wrong with the holodeck. And all the episodes where Geordi La forge is a dominant character.

Always ask where the data comes from.