Drop you XMR address and I'll send you some.
If you're trying to make some meandering point about liquidity and anonymity set, fine.
But don't act like all of bitcoin's liquidity is your anonymity set when it is a tiny fraction that is more comparable to Monero anonymity set.
And the ease and effectiveness of that privacy is a whole other argument.
"Are you under the impression that monero has more merchants and liquidity than Bitcoin? 🤪"
No, you're either just forgetting what your point was or your argument is just weak.
It's somewhat exaggerated, but not far off
I hope Bitcoin succeeds and becomes better and better to the point where Monero is not needed.
But sometimes it seems like the same mindset that made it great is not prevalent in Bitcoin's community anymore for the most part.
Yes, plug your ears, don't let the truth get in the way of Bitcoin maxi narratives
This guy is relying on the good graces of his government for bitcoin to succeed. Laughable.
No it isn't the same at all. Way more pitfalls with Bitcoin.
Privacy with Monero is not only much easier, but superior (receiver and amounts are never revealed onchain) and covers more layers compared to Bitcoin.
Funny meme, but no idea where you're getting me coping from.
Was Bitcoin created to solve the problem of liquidity? Guess what has more liquidity than Bitcoin: Cuckbucks
This is the cucked attitude I'm talking about. The whole point of crypto is making the opinion of regulators irrelevant, otherwise it is useless.
Bitcoiners have largely lost all adversarial thinking that has made it great.
They expect the best, and plan for the best as if they have already won, but the game has just started. The state has not seriously cracked down at all yet.
You're right privacy is a spectrum, so why not make it as easy as possible to achieve and hard as possible to mess up that privacy?
Bitcoin anon set is only as large as those who stick to best privacy practices, it is not all of bitcoin.
A very tiny fraction of bitcoiners do this.
Maybe we should all just agree to disagree for now 😅
There are trade-offs, but what is the original goal?
Yea, it is funny, but many subscribe to hyperbitcoinization global adoption prophecy. Are non-techy (AKA most of the world) left out of that?
Ok. If you believe BTC will outpace XMR in value over the longterm, you don't have to hodl XMR to take advantage of it's superior privacy and fungibility. That's a separate issue. But yes, do whatever you want idgaf either.
You all are not necessarily saying this - I just have a problem with claiming BTC is the best in every aspect imaginable. Clearly not true. Some maxis cannot admit that another crypto could have any advantage over bitcoin.
The difference is every time I make a cash transaction it is not broadcast and publicly available to the world along with my historical tx graph, remaining balance, and potentially my net worth. (Bitcoin worst case is worse than cash)
You can't trace the full history of cash. Even with SNs, all you can do is know the end points - where it was withdrawn and where it was deposited/confiscated. All the hops and p2p actors in between are not available.
Decent privacy for the spender, still bad for the receiver.
https://github.com/lnbook/lnbook/blob/develop/16_security_privacy_ln.asciidoc#attacks-on-lightning
Yes, physical cash is not completely perfect. But we're trying to achieve as close as possible the fungibility of an ideal money.
Would you knowingly choose to include the property of traceability in your implementation?