不是NFC这种，是将非托管类型的钱包 将节点和密钥分开，减少被攻击面，其实依然类似硬件钱包，只不过我感觉是更高频的场景，类似地，Nostr签名器之前也有人做出来了，大概十来刀。
不确定C端是否有这样的需求或者这样的C端有多大群体。
你可以看一个开源项目，VLS
大家怎么看待LN signer 这种较高频的设备？或者像类似Nostr Signer是否可以整合到一起？
喜欢观赏各种被称之为骚的操作，比如马斯克
普京皇帝真的尽力了，正传前传后传都要给大家一并演绎了，前车之鉴！
在通往独裁的道路上，清醒头脑的自不变感觉是，皇帝身边的草包与日俱增。
搜看了普里戈任生平简历，真心佩服这位一代枭雄，你定义他为粗鲁的，但他比你更缜密。当这位传奇以爱国的名义揭竿，并控诉皇帝身边的人是草包。也不难理解，为啥老毛子颠覆所有人期待一路败北，因为这本来就是独裁者的结局。皇帝或许自始至终都被蒙在鼓里。
比起愤怒，皇帝此时更多一些无奈和无助。因为皇帝知道，和他一样爱国的爱国者以爱国和清君侧的理由造反了！
当把“ Our money, your problem ”改口成“Our money, our problem ”。这是一种怎样的英雄主义！
from #[1] nostr:note1v6ccvskujxjt0f2v64kr6tw476xkfsnn7d8l3ah5j7t4ry428ztsy7tak2
How to reply to a PoS shitcoiner:
PoS has been around for thousands of years, it's nothing new. Government money is proof of stake, as are company shares.
Egyptians, Romans, and Chinese were using this 2000+ years ago. Italian city states perfected it 800 years ago. Stake based systems are not new.
Using stake to solve the Byzantine General's Problem is also not new. Cypherpunks have been working on this shit since the late 80s.
The cypherpunks on the mailing list (that Satoshi sent the white paper to for peer review) are literally the people who created the *entire body cryptographic of work* used by proof of stake coins today (stake based byzantine fault tolerance). They are well aware of the fundamental limitations of stake based BFT because they are ones who came up with it in the first place...
If Bitcoin was proof of stake *you would never have heared of it* because it wouldn't have survived 5 minutes of peer review by any real cryptographers.
Time-based difficulty-adjusted PoW *is* the breakthrough and is the *only* reason you and anyone has ever heard of a "blockchain".
The failure modes of stake based BFT are well known, and it fails *every time* for a number of reasons, but if you are betting on a shitcoin to increase in value then the failure mode will probably involve the fact that stakeholders have an incentive to increase the supply to benefit from the cantillion effect.
Mathematical fact: you cannot deploy external capital to defend a system that is secured by internal history (stake). This is why stake based BFT does *not* secure against attack by a state or central bank, which means *anything* secured by PoS MUST comply with governments.
Bitcoin's value proposition is that Bitcoin let's you do things that bankers and governments *don't want you to do*. If bankers and governmensts can nuke your shitcoin, then you do what they say or they nuke it.
What's the value proposition beyond CBDCs if your shitcoin ultimately has to comply with governments and bankers?
You cannot out-stake a bad actor who has aquired sufficient stake to fuck with the system, your only option is to fork them out. Then it becomes a competition between charismatic personalities convincing the market to follow their authority (their fork) instead of the other guy.
So how do you solve the problem of removing a bad actor without requiring some form of authority? Read the Bitcoin white paper. Satoshi knew exactly how stake based systems fail, that's *exactly* why he used proof of work instead.
Liquidity is layer3
是非即成败
scaling LN 新技术层出不穷，才证明闪电网络是一个网络。
闪电网络将是以后各个FIAT稳定币垂死角逐的战场。
LightningLayer是数字资产价值交换的介质。
Routing Fees 是BTC本位的无风险收益定价工具（国债）
Open LSP是国债承销商。
大概从初一开始玩儿大话西游，持续了6年，对游戏里盛唐景象有一种由来已久的喜爱和留恋。几千年以后的昨天，大唐芙蓉园再现了当年歌舞升平，西域可汗来朝参见，梦回大唐的盛景。恍如隔世却油然而来了一种反胃。心中的大唐已经不在了。
通道拼接，等级通道，通道工厂等也都在onboarding和后续管理通道时尽可能减少链上开支。真正的bitcoiner克制地在用技术让每个人都有属于自己的区块空间，那些短期的捞钱的比特币建设者正在肆无忌惮挥霍区块空间。爱是克制。
#onlyZap
扭曲的机器
如果能为一种追求自由的事业奋斗，一定是幸福的