Avatar
Scott
120c9931245965428e61327a4d6b5391bbe77ebd264ed5525253b722882fde8e
we sold our chairs for a seat at the table

Not bad so far, but the bar is so low

Watching the state of the union, reluctantly

Bitcoin will set you free

Looks like it's time to half the opendime wedding gift sat quantity

Replying to Avatar Asanoha

nostr:npub1qtvl2em0llpnnllffhat8zltugwwz97x79gfmxfz4qk52n6zpk3qq87dze is actually more profitable for miners and hashers than other pools from what I understand. And that money on the table is negligible when the risk is an outright attack on bitcoin that could be catastrophic in the long run if the bug is not fixed. Besides the multiple reasons people should not be scamming and grifting on bitcoin, the difference is between a high and low time preference on the miners part regarding the extra fees from the shitcoins. Do you want bitcoin to become like Etherium?

You could apply the same rationale you use here to censoring transactions of blacklisted addresses and your argument holds.

Personal attacks. Classy, and highly relevant to the substance of the argument!

It's choosing to mine a less profitable block. So leaving money on the table for miners. The reason? Censorship. At least that's how I see it.

Find a way, or find an excuse!