A brilliant meme idea just came to me. might take me a few weeks to finish, but when it's done I will have reached my peak meme creation.
Berkey filtered water hits different
The underlying culture of the US dictates that we will move towards the property that cannot be seized. Find me another state in the world where individual property rights are more engrained in the people than in the US.
I've been trying to find one and I can't.
The scarcity mindset is very high in Western water use cases. Definitely a symptom of fiat money expressing itself through a natural resource experiencing the "tragedy of the commons".
So like is there a spybot (kind 1984) going around making lists and reports, dafuq is that?
#AskNostr
Found the spicy note of the morning. GM bro 😂
I'm planning on it.
84 years later

You can't live in your Bitcoin, but you sure can bet on your Bitcoin helping you afford something to live in.
I guess I'm trying to figure out what I'm needing to specify. The idea is that ETF institutions represent a big voice. I'm trying to figure out what the leverage point is for them to want to advocate for privacy rights on Bitcoin.
They have to have an incentive. Maybe it would help them to shield their Bitcoin purchases in the future as the asset gets more scarce?
They are competing with one another after all.
there's something to the privacy conversation that adds value to holding Bitcoin. it's like an aspect of the money that is a built in property. if we can identify what that value is, I think it can be quantified.
that would be true if they were transacting on anything but L1. their daily flows are strictly L1 and it's cash create...so at this point in time that's not a concern.
what incentives do the ETF suits have to defend Bitcoin privacy?
they are apart of Bitcoin now too. what can the maximalists do to unlock their lobbying power?
there has to be something #asknostr
if I'm the beneficiary of a grant where the grantor has written off the donation as non-taxable...but I'm paying taxes on my earned income...that's a direct form of financial repression.
Steal from the person who is earning the grant $ for the work requiring the grant money..while the grantor, likely a wealthy benefactor or organization, writes off the grant dollars from their taxable liability.
Shit. Link ain’t work.
https://youtu.be/InhDBGVYA9E?si=KzNp8tfoqcXIL0x9 nostr:note13kucw0wkvcvpnvzn5we45d6thk59fpwcmgax4wx95v4lu97ltfnqh9e5fc
Just edit the note. It's fine.
I believe in you Tatum.
Not what I'm saying. The draconian nature of our governments monopoly on the global reserve currency is going to force Bitcoiners onshore to increase the cost of attack.
Freedom, liberty and property rights are engrained in the US culture unlike anywhere else. It only seems like a rational thing to me that US Bitcoiners step up to the plate and deliver the solutions that our draconian government can't stop.


