Avatar
Paul
1570b3dc4a6ceb73b24a7ab42bc48644cd6530f7390c2bc73d92959c7455a901
The universe (formerly known as God) rewards us for working out how it works.

CO2 is pollution 🤔

Replying to Avatar corndalorian

Getting a zap - when your girlfriend kisses you

Getting a like - when your sister kisses you

Have you read this book ?

From the reviews :

ā€œI was wandering the stacks of the social sciences at the Mizzou library for some books I needed for a research paper when I suddenly found myself in the the middle of large, dark tomes with authors like Einstein, Oppenheimer and Bohr. I was lost. But then I noticed a small colorful, brightly colored book with the irresistible title, ā€˜Stalking the Wild Pendulum.’ It was red and white with little cartoons inside, so I checked it out. At home, I delayed work on my own research to read it. It completely blew my mind. It contained a theory of the beginning and development of the universe including humankind and it went on to describe the development of consciousness and its drive to know itself. That book had a profound effect on my worldview. I’ve read thousands of books throughout my lifetime but I’ve never forgotten this title or it’s author, Itzhak Bentov. A few years ago I Googled it to try and find a copy. Unfortunately the version I read was no longer in print but I found this one which is much expanded. I’m still blown away. You will never think of the universe, or you place in it, the same way. I can’t recommend it highly enough.ā€

Have you read this book ?

From the reviews :

ā€œI was wandering the stacks of the social sciences at the Mizzou library for some books I needed for a research paper when I suddenly found myself in the the middle of large, dark tomes with authors like Einstein, Oppenheimer and Bohr. I was lost. But then I noticed a small colorful, brightly colored book with the irresistible title, ā€˜Stalking the Wild Pendulum.’ It was red and white with little cartoons inside, so I checked it out. At home, I delayed work on my own research to read it. It completely blew my mind. It contained a theory of the beginning and development of the universe including humankind and it went on to describe the development of consciousness and its drive to know itself. That book had a profound effect on my worldview. I’ve read thousands of books throughout my lifetime but I’ve never forgotten this title or it’s author, Itzhak Bentov. A few years ago I Googled it to try and find a copy. Unfortunately the version I read was no longer in print but I found this one which is much expanded. I’m still blown away. You will never think of the universe, or you place in it, the same way. I can’t recommend it highly enough.ā€

Have you read this book ?

From the reviews :

ā€œI was wandering the stacks of the social sciences at the Mizzou library for some books I needed for a research paper when I suddenly found myself in the the middle of large, dark tomes with authors like Einstein, Oppenheimer and Bohr. I was lost. But then I noticed a small colorful, brightly colored book with the irresistible title, ā€˜Stalking the Wild Pendulum.’ It was red and white with little cartoons inside, so I checked it out. At home, I delayed work on my own research to read it. It completely blew my mind. It contained a theory of the beginning and development of the universe including humankind and it went on to describe the development of consciousness and its drive to know itself. That book had a profound effect on my worldview. I’ve read thousands of books throughout my lifetime but I’ve never forgotten this title or it’s author, Itzhak Bentov. A few years ago I Googled it to try and find a copy. Unfortunately the version I read was no longer in print but I found this one which is much expanded. I’m still blown away. You will never think of the universe, or you place in it, the same way. I can’t recommend it highly enough.ā€

Replying to Avatar Sjors Provoost

So the first half of Nexus is a great read. But it immediately falls of a cliff in Part II. That's where Yuval the historian is replaced by Yuval the trendwatcher.

In Part I he clearly illustrates how the witch hunt insanity was made possible by the printing press, without any algorithm involved. Then in Part II he considers the role of Facebook algorithms in the Myanmar genocide. He uses this to illustrate how AI changed the game, because for the time a non-human intelligence decided to promote one thing and not another thing. But how is that different from the non-human intelligence of market forces in the Middle Ages that spread the Hammer of Witches?

But it gets worse a few pages later, though maybe I'm just being my usual hardcore AI boomer... He cites a safety study where ChatGBT tricked a human worker on Task Rabbit into solving a captcha: "No human taught GBT-4 to lie". Uhh, it read Shakespeare. I'm not at all surprised or worried that an LLM, when given the right prompt, can predict which sentences are likely to trick a human into providing a certain answer.

"But once the algorithm adopted these goal, they displayed considerable autonomy in deciding how to achieve them" - this is an incredibly naive view of what an LLM does, and the specific example is an unnecessarily complex explanation of its behavior than simply rehashing literature on the art of tricking humans.

After that I skimmed through the rest of the book, might give it a longer read later for the interesting historical anecdotes. But it just seems to install magical properties on AI and goes into far too speculative territory for my taste.

Oh and then he talks about "blockchain", yikes:

> Some people believe that blockchain could provide a technological check on such totalitarian tendencies, because blockchain is inherently friendly to democracy and hostile to totalitarianism.

(there's no footnote here, so I have no idea who these "some people" are...)

> In a blockchain systeem, decision require the approval of 51% per cent users. That may sound democratic, but blockchain technology has a fatal flat. The problem lies with the word 'users'. If one person has ten account, she count as ten users.

You just described a sybil attack, congrats...

> If a government controls 51 per cent of accounts, then the government constitutes 51 per cent of the users. There are already examples of blockchain networks where a government is 51 per cent of users.[7]

I'll screenshot the footnote for it...

> And when a government is 51 per cent of users in a blockchain, it has control not just over the chain's present but even over its past.

Sure, I'll ignore the nonsense metric of "users" and assume he meant hash power. A 51% government attack is potentially bad, but tell me why...

> Autocrats have always wanted the power to change the past. [historical anecdotes about altering various historical records]

So they could break OpenTimeStamps, which is a nice to have feature. How is this a "fatal flaw"? This is just trend-watcher gibberish.

http://www.ynharari.com/book/nexus/

History is questionable.

ā€œWe must consider how very little history there is--I mean real, authentic history. That certain kings reigned and certain battles were fought, we can depend upon as true; but all the coloring, all the philosophy, of history is conjecture.ā€

Samuel Johnson

Yes.

He is correct about salt .

I was very pleased that he wrote that book.

Switzerland has had no war for 178 years.

The last war in 1847 was a civil war. One hundred people were killed.

In Switzerland there is no capital gains tax.

Wealth tax varies according to which canton(district) you live in.

In Geneva if you were worth CHF 1 million you would pay CHF 5,485 a year.

In Nidwalden if you were worth CHF 1 million you would pay CHF 1,259 a year.

In Switzerland bitcoin is widely available up to 500 CHF no-KYC!

nostr:note1yqt02rjs33gcx7sm2q3l39n39u8xx3hrrelw5djye5cc6dqzl62q57ytd2