Also, isn’t it weird that you say that “Iran has some capability of creating nuclear weapons” when you call it a 30 years of psyops? Iran was developing nuclear weapons and Israel delayed them for a long time. Bombing targeted locations and killing scientists. So yes, they are both developing nuclear weapons for a long time and not achieving it yet. Doesn’t mean the danger isn’t real and it’s all a conspiracy

Yeah, if you apply “based on primitive religious doctrine” to both those countries equally you are definitely a retard

“If you can’t distinguish between the nuclear threat of a Western democracy and the nuclear threat of dictatorial theocracy based on primitive religious doctrine, you’re either a retard or your fragile ego is so invested that you effectively act like a retard”

The claim was simple: If you can’t distinguish between the nuclear threat of a Western democracy versus a theocracy based on primitive religious doctrine, you’re retard (or your fragile ego is so invested that you effectively act like a retard).

Your response? ‘But Western intervention!’ Sure, that played a role. So did centuries of fundamentalist religious ideology.

Now - and try to stay on topic this time - do you see ANY difference between Iran having nukes and Israel having nukes? do you think it would be reasonable at some point to try to prevent it militarily?