The claim was simple: If you can’t distinguish between the nuclear threat of a Western democracy versus a theocracy based on primitive religious doctrine, you’re retard (or your fragile ego is so invested that you effectively act like a retard).
Your response? ‘But Western intervention!’ Sure, that played a role. So did centuries of fundamentalist religious ideology.
Now - and try to stay on topic this time - do you see ANY difference between Iran having nukes and Israel having nukes? do you think it would be reasonable at some point to try to prevent it militarily?