A paper route. I quit the day they told us we had to go door to door and ask for tips.

No-stir or Nah-stir?

After earnings we have calls with institutional investors.

Today we had one where someone asked about our c= announcement and lightning in general, and ended the question with one on lightning’s intersection with nostr (and even pronounced it correctly).

Has anyone implemented BIP57 in Node.js? If so, can you link me to your repo? 🤗

Check out that sweet check mark. Thanks to #[0]​ & #[1]​ for helping me get setup. 👍

Have a zap in the mean time

In 8 more years that’s what all these 1,000 sat zaps will feel like.

“Hey babe! I just found an old WoS account with like 10 zaps from 2023! We’re going to Hawaii!”

ChangeTip was how I used to orange pill people.

He muted “Nostr” so we’re safe boys!!

Wallet of Satoshi processed over 150,000 LN payments last week.

Lightning adoption continues to accelerate.

⚡️

I want to make public my concern about "NFTs" which are being sold utilizing my name. Recently, a picture of code I wrote was sold at auction for .41 BTC. It was advertised as my code in the listing and presented to the public for sale and profit. Let me be clear – I was not involved with the creation and sale of this or any other "NFTs". I have not consented to the use of my code or my name for this purpose. Instead, 3rd parties are marketing my name and my code for their own monetary gain. Worse yet – they are creating confusion in the marketplace to the extent that the auction “winner” contacted me and stated: “Think I won your auction? 😊”. Stop using my name to mislead the public so you can make a quick buck. It’s wrong.

The public should also be aware that the seller and/or auction site offered me a donation of 90% of the auction proceeds “should I choose to accept” it. I feel this is a clear attempt to: (1) bribe me into silence; and/or (2) obtain my consent after the fact. I will not accept such payment at the expense of the public who are being misled. I will not accept any such “donation”.

Due to the misrepresentation involved and actual buyer confusion, I strongly insist upon 100% of the auction proceeds to be refunded to the buyer.

I felt obligated to speak out, not just for myself, but for other Bitcoin devs who are being placed in similar situations. The amount of money we have been offered as “donations” for acquiescing to what is taking place is considerable. I do not condone it. I do not consent to the use of my name or code for this grift. I want the public to be aware of where I stand.

I want to do whatever I can do to limit the damage which will inevitably be caused by this confusing and misleading behavior.

I need to follow more devs. Holla at me 👋