Avatar
CappyNate🍁
18fcc139950a9cce3fee5ee4f4f46f3e3f0e338277dcc8bcd692b3ce0e94084e
Tech, money, startups, free-markets. Sidelined by undiagnosed neurological issues since 2020. 🕔 heatstr.vercel.app (Busiest Nostr hours) Banned by LinkedIn Nov 11, 2024.

Nice work. FYI the biggest bug I notice on Primal is "update reliability".

Primal misses some event notifications (likes, comments, follows, follow counts) that other clients like Amethyst or Snort picks up.

But Primal is the fastest and most usable client by far. Tradeoff, I know. But something to work on.

Yes and discouraged workers. IE. Unemployed people, who haven't looked for a job in 4 weeks.

"We don't need to include those people in UR. Naaa."

Just like how they conveniently omit asset prices from CPI to pad the stat.

They LITERALLY put "employment rate" in the same chart.

Yet people will still quote the gov stated unemployment rate of 4.5%. Knowing full well that the sum of both are 30% from adding up to 100%.

Even with headmath, you have to look at that and go. WTF man?

Milgram's experiment in the flesh.

It boggles my mind that people can look at the "unemployment rate" and go "Ahh yes, that's a legitimate statistic✅ ".

See below. If 63.4% are employed. Then by grade 2 math, 36.6% are not employed, or UNemployed. No matter what the gov says.

Hahaha I told you that cat was a killer posing as a teddy bear!! 🤣🤣🤣

Ya Primal rocks. It doesn't have the most reliable updates (misses some events likes, comments in the notifications). But it's definitely the fastest and most usable.

Ya these university empires are not it. Spend more money on fancy buildings than program efficiency.

Similar thoughts to yours. A type of collaborative platform. Open sources ish. But contributors compensated. Like 80% of the info is already out there. It's just a matter of packaging it into a program with a bow on it.

But there's also tricky concepts to the user.

So as the user navigates through the program, they could vote on how easy each concept is. If it's hard, contributors could see this frustration in their portal, and brainstorm ways to explain it simpler. Then go back and paste in that simplification (either text, video, graphic; media agnostic).

The easiest to understand explanation shows to the user as the primary, so the path of least resistance to enlightenment occurs. And the contributor gets compensated for viewership. Rewarding good simple explanations.

Also, attacking learning painpoints like this en-masse reduces the dependance on expensive 1-on-1 tutoring. It provides the path of least resistance to knowledge. User experience, applied to education.

Yup you're right. Can add others after. One step at a time. Also some other programs are offered online (EdX, Coursera, Udemy), but Med is not. Focus first on building what doesn't exist.

The programs that are offered online are via traditional legacy universities (even on these platforms). So their costs are astronomical vs an automated on-demand program.

IE: A comp-sci degree should cost $500 to $1000, not $20,000. The whole degree, not just courses.

Online med school program. Med theory only.

Digital, borderless, unlimited capacity, no age limits, no pre-requisites, low-fee to no-fee.

I would incentivize current doctors to compile existing online materials from Wikipedia, Journals, even YouTube into a standardized program. Then create their own content for any materials not covered well.

The goal is for anyone to access, anyone to afford, and anyone to work through at their own pace.

Once a student completes the program, they can move on to practicum elsewhere. But the theory-only knocks a solid 1/4 to 1/3 off the total program time/cost. Allowing these practicums to operate with greater capacity.

I'm purple pilling on LinkedIn right now. 🟣 🟣 💜