This is the one place I think it could make sense to use a blockchain for global consensus strictly to help map pubkeys to relays
Send us some examplesđđđ
Podcasts are nextâŚ
I love having channels as branded npubs, I think this model should be applied much more throughout nostr. Anything that âownsâ events should be an npub
It would make it a bit harder to find your full follow list and thus harder to query for your feed
You could always include a p tag to your main Pubkey in the articles written as a group
The users main key would act as a nip46 ephemeral signer
say I create a document about "Stalin" and I add ["p", "<nostr:npub1mygerccwqpzyh9pvp6pv44rskv40zutkfs38t0hqhkvnwlhagp6s3psn5p >", "editor" ]
this would mean that the most recent version of my version of Stalin is whatever comes back from the REQ { "#d": ["stalin"], authors: [
For collaboration stuff, I like the idea of creating shared access to a Pubkey managed by a nsecbunker. That way the owner can easily add or remove access
This is almost LinkedIn like, where the number of connections shown is capped at 500, and they make a big deal about mutual connections
Got to be something revolving around web of trust. Thatâs the only way I can see building something thatâs truly hard to game
But maybe it already is⌠I guess everyoneâs expectations will just continue to rise
Barrier to entry into programming will certainly plummet. It will be pretty trivial for anyone to throw together a crud app
I kind of love him. Not a fan of his buddy Kevin Rose. But I think Tim is a well-intentioned guy
Do you think thereâs any future for a decentralized dns-like protocol for unique vanity names?
In a world where people write that data on chain, it becomes trivially easy to find and impossible to censor