Avatar
Zach
1b5c7f2f8a8f7e7ea7775879fd02d098db6ec588114521f1a1edfccd635c1fe9
🩄

I’m not familiar with satslash. Is that related to sat names based on Casey’s docs?

I think the biggest issue with any new unique name protocol is avoiding squatters. You need some means of making it costly to occupy valuable names

Replying to Avatar David King

i’m interested in this problem:

https://spacesprotocol.org/

anyone do a pros/cons analysis yet? would this be a good alternative to NIP-05 names for nostr?

I don’t see what this offers that ordinals and inscriptions don’t beyond not being associated with the word

I’m afraid the gender split on Nostr may make this difficult 😂

I think nostr poses a unique use case where given that there is not just one type of client, there shouldn’t be just one type of relationship. There is space in the protocol to have “friends”, “followers”, “connections”, and many others

Bitcoin is still very volatile. If you can’t afford to lose it or have the price fall significantly short term you should not buy

Replying to Avatar Derek Ross

Nope. nostr:npub1dtgg8yk3h23ldlm6jsy79tz723p4sun9mz62tqwxqe7c363szkzqm8up6m will be be in attendance still, talking about his new Minecraft server called Satlantis.

Is it G?

Another concern that I have is once you start spreading funds across hundreds of mints, then you start to lose the beauty of how easy and seamless it is to send and receive ecash.

With the torrent model, the consequences of a dishonest actor are limited and the incentives to be dishonest are virtually nonexistent. Whereas with ecash there is a financial incentive to rug users and little recourse for users beyond lowering the attackers web of trust score.

If I have a Pubkey but nothing else, I won’t even know which relays to search. I a world where Nostr has billions of users and there are thousands of relays, having a single space to discover where a Pubkey advertises where they publish notes would be useful