Avatar
Celata
1db113ebbf6dca151c2971fc8e61e378d2b2c95b5b029789a996ea47a775d16f

It definitely has the same value, it's just that you can buy less with it!

If the Kremlin said it, you can pretty much guarantee that it isn't true.

We're loving the magical Ukrainian drones that teleport to Moscow and materialize out of thin air to drop on the Kremlin ignoring all the anti-air systems placed on the roofs. Hilarious stuff, please send more.

Keep on demonstrating your hatred of Jews as well, that's bound to go down well with the rest of the world.

Democracy is just a form of government. The ethics and morality of initiating force against innocents are regulated by international agreements, not governments.

Arguably this has been the case forever. Even first-hand witness statements are not reliable since it is well known that your brain fabricates a huge proportion of what you consider to be your perceptions, in order to facilitate predicting your environment.

Otherwise optical illusions, for instance, could not exist.

Replying to Avatar jimmysong

In today's corporate landscape, companies like Bud Light face a delicate balancing act between appeasing the money printers and satisfying the market. On one hand, the former pushes them to promote progressive ideas, such as transgender rights, while on the other, the market remains resistant to such agendas. It's a struggle for corporations, as pleasing both is seemingly impossible.

Ignoring the market would annihilate Bud Light's sales and undermine its very existence. Pursuing a progressive agenda could lead to plummeting profits, and disregarding it could prompt boycotts that demand apologies. But apologizing would signal to the elites that Bud Light is willing to bow to public pressure, potentially endangering any chance of a bailout or favorable treatment from regulators. Loans and tax subsidies would become less likely, leaving the company at a competitive disadvantage.

However, facing a market boycott offers a glimmer of hope for a bailout. Elites might orchestrate a buyout, as seen in recent bank failures, where companies pass the responsibility until the issue cools down. But this outcome is far from ideal for Bud Light, as being bought for a fraction of the company's worth could result in a barrage of lawsuits and headaches.

The alternatives seem bleak for Bud Light. It could fully embrace progressive values in hopes of attracting a new market, but this would likely lead to downsizing and an unhappy marriage with its new target audience.

This situation reflects a broader social trend: the cultural right is pushing back. What began in 2016 as a cold war is now escalating, with boycotts flexing their muscles against the seemingly insurmountable power of the deep state and fiat money. The deep state's overreach in recent years has led to a growing discontent among the public, with figures like RFK Jr. gaining traction.

In this battle of wills, the elites still hold considerable power through fiat money, but their control is being questioned. We are not safer, nor are we freer. As the cultural tides shift, corporations like Bud Light must navigate these treacherous waters, choosing between market forces and the interests of the elites. Only time will tell which side will prevail, but one thing is clear: the struggle for balance is reshaping the corporate world, and the repercussions will be felt for years to come.

Bud Light isn't a company, it's a product. Anheuser-Busch is the company.

I also disagree that the transgender agenda is progressive. There are many aspects of it that are totalitarian and retrograde, destroying decades of work in women's and gay rights.

You are right that it is being pushed by some important people though. And that is because there is a lot of money to be made in pharma and medicine if you persuade people that they need drugs and surgery to really be themselves. Follow the money.

Perhaps. But let's do a little thought experiment.

Your government says that in order to apply for your driving license you must use an online form on the internet. You cannot legally drive without filling in this form.

On the form there is a required field marked Religion. You have to choose one option. The options are:

- Atheist

- Muslim

- Sikh

That's it.

Were you able to avoid walking in the dog shit?

The Kremlin really needs to work on their meme game. This is just lame.

Banning and censoring me from lesbian safe spaces for not being sexually attracted to "girldick" is not supporting me, it is homophobia. The "LGBTQIAS+" alphabet nonsense is not my community, and it is not the gay community, transgender and queer has nothing to do with homosexuality and it has nothing to do with the oppression we have faced, except in as much as yet again I find biological males telling me what I can and can't do.

I am not interested in the trans community, you can have your own space if you want. But the trans community wants to exclude me from MY space. You seem to think that slapping a label of "transphobe" on me for whatever reason gives you permission to oppress me in any way you want. What is your definition of "transphobe"? Someone who refers to you with pronouns you don't want them to? If so you are trying to police other people's thoughts.

Replying to Avatar ΛJΛXX / Sam

1. Again, I don't support this kind of violence. Plus because of a transgender woman being violent, does it mean all of trans folks are violent as well ? I don't really get the point here.

2. Presence of trans folks in sports is a tricky subject I don't really know much about, I don't really want to engage on this. But there's some studies saying the gap between trans & cis women isn't really clear : https://www.bbc.com/sport/61346517

3. Children are NEVER forced to transition, and nobody except oneself is able to know and say they're trans. Surgical transition isn't authorized on minors (or it shouldn't). The advice of the child should always be asked.

4. Nobody forced anyone to date transgender women. These bans are against transphobes who don't even respect trans folks.

1. It does not mean that all trans people are violent. But it does mean that women must be protected against the risk of violence. The violence is perpetrated almost exclusively by biological males. So biological males need to be excluded from women's safe spaces (toilets, abuse shelters, prisons).

3. Children cannot by their very nature give informed consent, just as they cannot give informed consent for sex, therefore "the advice of the child" is worthless. Transition IS being imposed on children in anglophone countries, strangers are deciding for the child if they qualify as trans and the parents are being overridden or kept in the dark. You can research many examples of this. Here are examples of it being imposed on children as young as two years old: https://100percentfedup.com/sick-three-leading-n-carolina-hospitals-offer-gender-affirming-care-to-children-as-young-as-2-yrs-old/

4. A transphobe is being defined by trans rights activists as someone who doesn't want to date transgender woman, so your logic is circular. Trans activists are literally banning people for saying they don't want to sleep with them. And the spaces that they are being banned from are spaces that were created by them and for them. It is as if I invited you into my house, then you stole my keys, said it is your house now and kicked me out because I didn't want to sleep with you.

Unfortunately this is not true. Claiming to be something that you are not DOES change things for other people as I have explained several times to you with examples.

If you could just express yourself without colonizing other people's space, nobody would have any problem with that. The only reason there is conflict here is because you (or trans rights activists in general) are crossing a line into territory that already belongs to someone else.

"gender is a social construct, it's just a part of a person's identity, allowing it to be what we want"

You misunderstand what identity is. Your identity is not what you feel about yourself or how you think about yourself inside your own head. Look at your identity card. It lists the important details about you that OTHER people use to distinguish you from anyone else: your date of birth, your place of birth, your sex, your name. Inside your head you don't need a name, you're the only person in there. Your date of birth is irrelevant inside your head. Your identity is what other people agree on to say that you are this person and not that person. As such your identity absolutely doesn't allow you to be what you want, it is not your decision to make.

"People choosing their gender doesn't affect your life, so why do you care?"

I don't care how you present. I do care if you claim to actually be a woman, because that is objectively false, and misogynistic, and endangers women.

"Sex (or genitals) is indeed a biological reality, but its only importance is for when you want to have kids, else we don't give a damn about what's in people's pants."

There are lots of people who don't want to have kids but very much do care what is in the pants of people they want to have sex with or form emotional relationships with. The fact that you might not, should not be used to invalidate those people.

Could you consider the psychological violence to women of biological males harassing us in our supposedly safe spaces?

https://twitter.com/OliLondonTV/status/1651985668044730370

Could you consider the psychological violence to women of biological males competing in our sports category when they are physically much stronger than us, obviously winning all the trophies and making a mockery of our achievements?

https://www.outkick.com/biological-male-cyclist-does-the-unthinkable-somehow-smokes-biological-females-to-win-tour-event-overall-title/

Could you consider the psychological damage to children of telling them that they are in the wrong body, that they need to be sterilized and mutilated and medicated for the rest of their lives, which may not be long anyway since the drugs used to suppress puberty permanently damage their bones and cause other severe medical problems?

https://www.californiafamily.org/2022/04/yes-mutilation-surgeries-are-performed-on-children/

Could you consider the psychological damage to lesbians of telling them that they must date biological males or be banned and censored from their own spaces, doxed and receive death and rape threats?

https://www.openlynews.com/i/?id=1d8e4853-fd83-4fbb-b0b4-ebab528f0ac2