Avatar
GameBoyBTC
1dfe0fd88b77a3dcd13fccea505619ead0c8ca266da8ee0505d15fc9c7f4ffb3
Snob de #Bitcoin ๐Ÿค“ Pseudo Trader ๐Ÿ˜œ memes ๐Ÿ˜Ž #GameBoyMarket โšก๏ธ๐Ÿ‘พ from Venezuela ๐Ÿด

Good point of view to analyze the health of the Network according to those 5 points and how from here some agents can at least take an opinion on how Bitcoin behaves.

I agree that one of the current shortcomings is the concentration of chip manufacturing in a few companies and that large numbers of miners are under a single jurisdiction.

As for the future, the issue of privacy will be one of the main issues that we have to fight. If I see it, it's going to happen as something exogenous. But I would say that it will be one of several fronts that will be fought. Even for being pessimistic to internal struggles such as the issue of "filtering" transactions. I think many things are being cooked little by little. It is also expected that this will happen with an Antifragile system such as Bitcoin

GM โ˜•๐Ÿ‘พ

๐Ÿ’ช

Interesting approach to the definition and its different edges by nostr:npub1t0nyg64g5vwprva52wlcmt7fkdr07v5dr7s35raq9g0xgc0k4xcsedjgqv Perhaps it lends itself to some confusion because of the title. Although I was clear on your point of view that what is self-custody are the Ecash units within that system.

It also created an interesting discussion in the comments ๐Ÿ˜

Replying to Avatar ODELL

Factos

โšก๐ŸŸฃ

Buen dรญa (GM) mi gente ๐Ÿ‘พ

Replying to Avatar Juraj

So there's this progression. First you see something like Cashu when you say, "Oh, it's a custodial lightning wallet with better privacy for users and no accounts." And then you realize, "Oh, I can use this to pay someone who is offline. I just send them a string and thatโ€™s the ecash note.โ€ And then you realize, "Oh, this works over long range radio with very low bandwidth. And then you realize, oh, if we trust the same mint, we can actually use it to route lightning payments without open channels to the mint (the channel is the trust). And we can use it as a lightning wallet for ourselves. And then you can say, oh, we can create these community mints for โ€œislandsโ€ that are not connected to the internet.

And then you realize, "Oh, there can be more than one Uncle Jim, and we don't have to trust this one person. We can have shared custody, and this thing has better privacy." And suddenly you realize you are were not expecting anything like this at all when you first saw it, when it began. It has completely different implications than what I was expecting previously.

It's the same with Nostr. It's like, "Oh, this is not a very good protocol. It depends on a few relays and you canโ€™t even store images on it and who would use it." And it's cumbersome. Now there are blogging platforms and communities and marketplaces and AI communicating over it. And there's this innovation that no one was expecting when they first started. It was like thinking about the protocol and trying to judge it by its design, but its use (and implications) is discovered, not designed. Same way you can send a calendar invite over email, or do encrypted group chats over it (DeltaChat).

Itโ€™s interesting to see, how we use technologies that in theory should not have worked, but in practice, they do. Bitcoin is one of them. The probability of its success was very low.

A friend of mine said in a podcast with me that Bitcoinโ€™s risk adjusted value is actually better than a decade ago. Yes, you could have bought cheap Bitcoin. But its success back then was very improbable. Now you are buying the asset of the parallel financial system, back then, it was a membership card in a club of geeks. After several that have failedโ€ฆ

Buen punto ๐Ÿ‘

Ahora sin sueรฑo ๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ˜ฉ

Noche del sรกbado de lectura ๐Ÿค“๐Ÿ“–