True for text content, but media content "on" nostr is already not on nostr. Those files are just uploaded to nostr-auth-enabled silos and linked via plain old DNS, same as linking any other resource on the Web.
Good explanation. I would say an API can *become* a (quasi) protocol (see e.g. S3 API), but a protocol can not become just an API.
Wasn't the worst movie I've ever seen, but it was incredibly annoying that they didn't bother showing the actual rescue in the end.
So Ditto uses some kind of key delegation?
I'm watching kind 4 direct messages from popular relays in a live stream, and it feels almost as dirty as watching the Venmo firehose, albeit with encrypted content at least.
First time I see this stat on nostr:npub12vkcxr0luzwp8e673v29eqjhrr7p9vqq8asav85swaepclllj09sylpugg. Wild if true. ⚡ 
Alas, there's no way to confirm it. Someone could've faked most of that amount.
Enjoying noStrudel a lot! Looks basic at first, but is actually much more capable than most clients. And yet, it feels lightweight and fun.
Why integrate directly, when interoperability is provided by the Lightning network anyway? What's the major benefit? 🤔
That's what I told Frank and Smuggler in person ~5 years ago, when they published Scrit. Alas, they were not convinced. But fantastic that nostr:npub1nc0ynppqh37rtulr57xjqpzmfjp58xrd4ey8896ehn9j5flg33fszrz5pa picked it up where they left off! 🙏
Thanks for the policy framework, nostr:npub1q3sle0kvfsehgsuexttt3ugjd8xdklxfwwkh559wxckmzddywnws6cd26p! Couldn't be any easier to integrate with. Spent half the day just fighting Docker to get Deno into the strfry container in our development setup.
Hooray! Just before the end of CEST Sunday, I have completed our strfry LDAP policy, which only permits known users to write to our #nostr relay!
(Beware that you will need to register the nostrKey attribute in your server's schema to make it searchable. You can find an LDIF file for that in the akkounts repo as well.)
There seem to be problems with Deno on basic Alpine base images, and the error is just as unhelpful as it could possibly be. :/
Every time someone inquires about my "career":
https://storage.kosmos.org/raucao/public/shares/240609-0205-marley-rich.mp4
I wish octopi weren't so damn delicious, because I frequently have to contend with the predicament of both admiring their intelligence and wanting to eat them.
We've been trying to get a bank account for a new Stichting for over a year now. Every single bank left us hanging for months on end until they suddenly got back to us with a rejection, but never stating their reasoning. And I'm not even angry at the banks per se, but mostly at the government for threatening them with heavy fines for not doing the required pre-crime policing in a way that leaves zero work for actual law enforcement.
Fun fact: I'm getting notified via #xmpp when you zap me on #nostr, because we're mixing up and connecting various decentralized protocols in our (open-source) accounts back-end. (And for secondary accounts I usually set it to notify via email.)
Also, I log into my Kosmos account using my Nostr key via nostr:npub1getal6ykt05fsz5nqu4uld09nfj3y3qxmv8crys4aeut53unfvlqr80nfm.
Many more integrations to come! Currently setting up our members-only relay, so we can do things like auto-sync notes and media to a user's #remoteStorage and such.
She could argue that the amount of money changing hands makes it of "compelling public interest", i.e. requires "transparency". A lot of people would probably agree, myself not included.
However, there's an actual lie in the subheader worth correcting, which is that he gave $10M directly to nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6. That claim is contradicted in the article itself even.
Never mind, just checked and they already corrected the title on the Business Insider website. Not sure if the Twitter link preview will be updated or not.
She could argue that the amount of money changing hands makes it of "compelling public interest", i.e. requires "transparency". A lot of people would probably agree, myself not included.
However, there's an actual lie in the subheader worth correcting, which is that he gave $10M directly to nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6. That claim is contradicted in the article itself even.
#CSW on "The Oxford Union Society" in 2019 talking about how he looks forward to proving himself in court (he also has a weird part in there about western culture being multi colored??).
https://blossom.oxtr.dev/effce26d2708a3d86d5236baeb346e3f57fdafe548a8cb3182cf8d52655880bf.mp4
"I find this whole world of a thousand years of common law important. I don't think coder's law is good. I think it is shit. I think coder's law is the lowest attack on modern society, the biggest SJW attack, trying to rip down everything we have good." — Satoshi Nakamoto