What we have now is chaos. Decentralization has an opportunity to change that. 💜

tyfys

Nostr is the future. We are just here early. Grateful to be here and I’m really stretched professionally in decentralized spaces so I like the challenge!

LFG!!! #catstr nostr:note1dsyz2e52rrczaxghqxqr9wyyltavggvzum7hmd7m3luvsc35s6fqndqsyy

I think that you will really like it. It’s not groundbreaking. My project after this one is more outside of the box… then I’ll retire. 😂

This is the type of content that I’m here for #catstr nostr:note19uygun6uwx75yrpvxuyphfa6wrrrarrdnsshgmj7t9w4l3v4fgyq02vjp2

So I’ve been told 😂😂😂

The suggestion above would be extreme. Privacy rights groups will probably smash it. That being said they went extreme to get the ID verification through.

“Alright, we will settle for ID verification” -the government still getting what they want

I hope that you like my new project! It was inspired by nostr. Online child safety in a decentralized future. I’ll put it up soon. It’s in the painful editing process. 💜

3. I’m realizing that there isn’t really a way to report AI generated CSAM to an org. As of right now, it would still go to NCMEC but it should be broken into a different report flow. I’m not really sure how to fix that so I’m thinking about that. I’m not sure what’s the best option. Perhaps I’m unable to locate where reports are being handled for that specific content in the US.

4. Outside of that I’m really just enjoying some of the parallel societies conversations although it’s hard for me to keep up because I’ve located pockets online that are discussing what I’m interested in learning about but they speak way above my head. It’s still fun for me.

I’m looking at a plethora of things.

1. I’m grateful for the reaction and harnessing of the positive energy for e/acc after Beff Jezos was doxxed by Forbes but I am thinking deeply about the broader implications. I’m nervous that it was an institutional show of power to anyone in tech wishing to use a pseudonym to create change without their blessing. I think those in positions of power are very willing to flex their muscles right now. That was a warning shot.

2. I’m also trying to decide how likely it is that they will decide to implement the below. I wasn’t expecting them to suggest something this aggressive. I have been expecting the ID and credit card for years, this suggestion is very aggressive from a privacy perspective.

https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/ai-could-judge-if-user-is-porn-watching-age-under-new-uk-guidance-2023-12-05/ nostr:note1telpavkyv74le9x0twyepfm8quuqgae0s5q6rpz6yrk9d7j3l0gs9ppp0k

I literally have nothing to add to the conversations. 😂

I don’t have anything to say about bitcoin. I’m sorry nostr. 😩

This video has me cracking up everyday.

Oddly enough I don’t have much to add because you said what I would have said but more eloquently.

I’d only add that as the world moves towards decentralization, advocates, parents/caregivers, and teachers etc should focus on preventing online child sexual exploitation through education and awareness. A strong educational push could at least help to curb the sextortion and SG-CSEM.

It would be helpful if nostr clients added a resource page if someone is experiencing online sexual exploitation. This could be added down the road because I don’t believe that it’s necessary…. Yet.

Example: When someone goes to report CSE on a client, after the report there would be resources available on that page.

If we are speaking specifically about child sexual exploitation, one of the biggest stories from a few days ago came from WSJ. The same journalist for WSJ covers this issue specifically for the media outlet.

https://www.wsj.com/tech/meta-facebook-instagram-pedophiles-enforcement-struggles-dceb3548

On a personal note, I have no reason to stand up for the corporate press. I have advocated for a free press and the freedom of Assange but I hate the corporate press and they hate me.

The corporate press and local media actually hasn’t ignored the topic for many years. Globally everyday there are many stories covered in the press.

I’d say that a more accurate statement would be that they are sometimes selective with coverage, knowingly cover for select abusers, the press has been slow to give survivors an opportunity to speak and write. There are some media outlets with bias about the crime on both sides of the political spectrum.

I’d actually say that a hyper focus by the general online population on one type of perpetrator is actually having a more harmful impact than a perceived lack of press coverage.

Example: If everyone is focusing on Epstein elite type of trafficking they are possibly ignoring what’s going on in their own communities. Folks forget to make sure their child isn’t being groomed in the next room by a predator online. I’m not trying to downplay one or over-sensationalize another aspect of the crime.

These screenshots are from google in the last 24 hrs. nostr:note1hjtvmfknw84n9nwaxafzdkz534ps0kaytmzar0sw200f54tgm9csjpl4vt

That’s what I’m saying. 😂

I thought that this was cute so I wanted to post it here nostr:npub1theparkprcs70dcs437ke9zzwsr6u60f8flu7rg28m30438aep9sd94dha