Avatar
Nice and Kind Vic
21b419102da8fc0ba90484aec934bf55b7abcf75eedb39124e8d75e491f41a5e
https://i.nostr.build/Lqsu56YxOCvwc6G5.jpg 💬 cornychat.com - audio spaces 🖼️ nodeyez.com - bitcoin node images Recommends: 🥣 zap.cooking 🎵 tunestr.io 📲 relay.tools 💩 turdsoup.com 🥔 oddbean.com 🔣 listr.lol 🕹️My Nintendo Switch Code SW-7592-4594-7016 About: I do programming, databases, data parsing, reports, visualizations. Bitcoin maxi. Available for hire Corny Chat (https://cornychat.com) operator, running the first open source audio spaces integrated with Nostr with support for zaps, room customizations. Nodeyez developer (https://nodeyez.com) providing sovereign scripts to get more from your node. It can generate images from your node accessible in a website dashboard or slideshow output to an attached display.
Replying to Avatar jack

Why

My guess is word of regular zapathon getting out and causing interest but just speculation

Looks like the toy version of Coronavirus for toddlers or dog squeegy toy

Releases are tagged in https://github.com/Blockstream/Jade/tags

The Blockstream website link is for convenient chrome serial

Replying to Avatar Gigi

I just redeemed 50 sats that nostr:npub1nxa4tywfz9nqp7z9zp7nr7d4nchhclsf58lcqt5y782rmf2hefjquaa6q8 has sent me via a 21 sat zap and now I find myself believing the hype

Is there a cashu wallet for mobile?

Replying to Avatar nym

In the event of a sudden reorganization of the blockchain, several technical considerations would be warranted, reflecting the described scenario.

Waiting for 1000 confirmations before considering a transaction safely received: This depends on your risk tolerance. Historically, six confirmations have been considered secure, but a reorg of 1000 blocks would certainly challenge this assumption. Depending on the perceived risk of further hidden chain mining, waiting for a larger number of confirmations might be prudent, although 1000 might be excessive and hamper practical usability.

As a node runner, rejecting the new tip and keeping tabs on bitcoin-cli getchaintips: You could technically choose to reject the new chain, but this would place you on a fork that might have less mining power and thus be less secure. Regularly checking chain tips and being aware of the state of the network would be a standard best practice. Depending on your view of the legitimacy of the new chain, you might want to take additional steps, such as manually specifying preferred peers that follow the chain you trust.

As a miner, considering pulling out of mining pools or creating new ones: If you suspect that a mining pool was contributing hash power to the secretly mined chain, you would likely want to reevaluate your participation in that pool. Using Stratum V2, which adds more security and transparency, would be a logical step to ensure that your hash power is being used as you intend. Creating new, trusted pools or joining known trustworthy ones could be an appropriate reaction as well.

If 1000 blocks are too many, what if it was 5?: If the reorganization was only 5 blocks, it would be within the realm of what's occasionally seen on the network (though still rare). In this case, a drastic change in behavior, such as waiting for hundreds of confirmations, might not be warranted. However, it might still prompt a review of the network, mining pools, and other factors to ensure that everything is operating as expected.

I appreciate your responses. Very informative.

I often write poorly performing code out of haste. Sometimes its so bad that I spend time optimizing. Just got done cutting rendering time by 80-90% on a panel

I had a rougher version of this panel before but hadn't yet included in Nodeyez as it was pretty raw.

When making a Bitcoin transaction, people balance the fee rate they will pay (preferring lowest) with the time they want the payment to go through (preferring soonest). Up until a few years ago people often used really poor services that tended to overestimate fees. Mempool.space has been a game changer and is really accurate in its estimates. But not everyone can run a local instance due to resource constraints.

The Nodeyez panel relies solely on the Bitcoin Core estimates and shows bands of fee rates for block inclusion targets and their respective sats per virtual byte cost. Y axis is the fee rate, and X axis is time from left to right. Vertical lines mark when blocks were found, with block numbers annotated at the bottom for context.

It just gives a local/sovereign alternative to running a local mempool.space service or trusting the publically available instance.

Nodeyez graphed Bitcoin Core Fee Estimates over time compared to current estimates and summary of 2 recent blocks from mempool.space

Going to a #Bitcoin Meetup tonight..will have a beverage. If you want to kick in some sats can zap this post

I think this actually could be related, but may piggyback the Bitcoin coinbase output that cant be spent for 100 confirmations. For example if a miner pegged into Liquid using their coinbase then that address (the peg in) couldnt be spent for 100 more blocks. Does make me curious if theres another reason