which did you notice first: the crow holding a quill pen, the gnome sitting eagerly, or the half eaten plate of shrooms? grandma knows how to treat company.
Have nuked the laptop.
- Reinstalled Ubuntu Mate, with disk encryption and yubikey
- Disabled middle button from trackpad
- Installed VS code
- Setup new SSH keys, and tied to github
- Followed dev guidance for setting up Nodeyez, found bug, pushed and merged correction
- Rebooted
Next up is configuring to access remote bitcoin node again
In this #InkblotArt, the lizard Klaus Schwab stands in the middle of an encircling group of humans who have had enough of the WEFs attempts to usurp and narrate their lives.
ugh. realized i wrote "inkspace" as the package name instead of "inkscape" in nodeyez dev tools setup, and also printed that way on back of handouts
in video driver hellscape.
going to nuke it from orbit
That assumes the payer has options. Or the payer saying they can pay in Litecoin or Doge. Which of those would you prefer?
But on a more serious note, need to think of incentives. The natural preference is for Bitcoin, as it can be quickly moved into a drivechain sidechain if so desired
Where in the world is Carmen Sandiego?
Do you believe a drivechain powered sidechain would have the liquidity of lightning to support this?
I think its possible with enough adoption, assuming rationale for demand but getting through an initial hurdle isnt guaranteed. Liquid suffers from this.
two reasons...
1. it hasnt been built yet
2. the fee may not be desireable
argh. this is getting problematic.
sometimes buildings just fall down for no reason. this is one of the reasons to avoid new york city.
Donβt forget to breath through these:
https://x.com/realjameswoods/status/1697198338012336203?s=46&t=Zk_WhuFR2mTqgXPRz2zqVQ
ooh. this one i hadnt seen before
I tested habla.news to post this. habla.news gave me errors during posting but seems it went through to some relays. Errors included: event too large (35331), event kind 30023 not allowed
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exvmngv34xuunjwp3qgszrdqezqk63lqt4yzgftkfxjl4tdatea67akeezf8g6a0yj86p5hsrqsqqqa28s0cx7a
if the tx was made from zeus sending funds to another wallet: a CPFP can be initiated in the receiving wallet to spend the unconfirmed inbound utxo, setting a fee higher such that the average fee of the original/parent transaction from zeus and that of the child transaction is amenable to being included in a block.
a rough math approach.... youll need to determine fee rate by adding the two tx sizes in vbytes, multiplying by current target fee, then with that product substract fees paid by the parent leaving the difference needing paid by the child. Take that difference and divide by vbyte size of child to get fee rate to set on child.
e.g. parent tx size 200 vbytes, at 3 sat/vbyte. current fee rate target is 10 sat/vbyte and child tx size to move it may be 160 vbytes
200*3 = paid 600 already
200+160 = 360 total size
360*10 = 3600 target total fees to pay
3600-600 = 3000 fees need paid by child
3000/160 = 18.75 fee rate for child
---
if the fee was made from zeus to open a channel with a node thats a different issue as that would need to involve the other node for the multisignsture wallet
---
one threat vector that i feel is underappreciated is reputation of Bitcoin related to the insinuation that the sidechain coins are just as valuable. they arent.
Someone receiving drivechain1 sidechain coins need to withdraw/move to btc (3+ months) before spending in a normal transaction, or depositing into drivechain2 sidechain.
that lengthy withdraw process to btc, and incompatibility between sidechains is a form of encumberance and the value of that in a drivechain sidechain may be discounted accordingly.
people who experience bitcoin first by receiving in a drivechsib sidechain will understandably be upset about the lengthy time they need to commit to in order to transact on chain to even move those funds to traditional lightning channels for Bitcoin. this can cause reputational harm to bitcoin as it will be (has been) lumped together (affinity grift)
the faster way out will be some service offering to setup a swap for a fee. peer to peer may be viable, but in either event the liquidity of such trades will be low.
Whats the longest amount of days youve had to wait for a wire to go through?
I have a transaction, made through nostr:npub1xnf02f60r9v0e5kty33a404dm79zr7z2eepyrk5gsq3m7pwvsz2sazlpr5 that, is stuck in low fee purgatory. Has been pending for days now and the ETA just gets higher.
What do now?
#asknostr
depends on transaction type. may be able to
RBF - replace by fee
CPFP - child pays for parent