I understand URSF will make chain split. I think it is just OK. I believe miner's side would become a B-cash likely chain.
How can we refuse MASF without chain split?
What if we assume that all verify nodes are URSF nodes? Wouldn't miners abandon MASF? This is why it looks like hardfork to me.
I don't understand. Do we not need URSF to refuse MASF? Would you please explain more?
The answer is URSF.
User Resisted Soft Fork
"For now I've set up a ##ursf channel on Libera IRC to monitor developments and discuss working on an additional release that if run may ultimately reject blocks that signal for CTV."
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-April/020262.html nostr:note17nv85vd9aqcupumcs2uzrmlc59rl3j3huwvwh03aajtxuqldqzusf56x56
URSF 라는 것을 통해서 원치 않는 소프트포크 블록을 거부할 수 있을 것이라고 하네요
nostr:note1qhcl0kqvwlsqyeqragwxqszlgc4ndd4qt28rmlxh43ttku62akwqxyal0m
Then the other softfork(maybe miner driven softfork) becomes hardfork. It seems that the term is not that critical.
Thank you.
As far as I know, Segwit UASF disagree with hardfork and agree with softfork.
However, what makes me confused is how to say NO through a node to miner driven softfork.
Is it "User Reject Soft Fork"?
It sounds another softfork from old chain and hardfork from miner driven softforked chain.
Am I understanding correctly?
What is that URSF and how does it defeat bikechain? I really want to know. Bellow is my confused thought.
nostr:note1rdg8krn6mqu25gvcuekxlj5cktv4kjt5ckavlcvwy4j484ld0ghsqgpjld
채굴자가 소프트 포크를 반대하는 상황에서 그 소프트 포크릉 활성화 하기 위해 UASF가 사용됐다고 이해를 했습니다.
지금은 조금 더르게 채굴자가 소프트 포크를 원할 때 노드가 어떻게 반대할 수 있을지 잘 모르겠습니다.
업데이트를 안 해도 소프트 포크 이후의 트랜잭션을 유효하다고 생각할테니까요.
That's not the only reason why AdamBack is a shitcoiner🤣
Who paid for this ad? nostr:note15dvrw2czaq77xtnkgeumps7nrahfx8ue68vpepc7kgv75nw8hqvq3cnupf
The idea of sidechain stinks so bad that it's hard to put up with it💩
Who does love this shit idea?
nostr:note1e83fyysxc5da4q540527gsqcp0qqyy9qyzycaft6tjzyrv3sywkstwkdqd
이거 왜 아동용인가요?ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
I'm confused. According to the book "The blocksizw war", UASF is separate node from Bitcoin Core. It implemented to say consent. But, I don't have any idea how to say opposition explicitly.
