I think we’re getting tangled in semantics.

Whether we call Bitcoin a “quantum computer,” a “Planck anchor,” a Universe within another or “time inside of time” these are poetic frames converging on the same structural reality:

Bitcoin is the only open and global system that irreversibly collapses entropy into memory with real energy.

It doesn’t simulate quantum behavior, it commits quantum outcomes. It defines time by work, memory by structure, and space as a consequence of resolution.

The act of mining is a quantum measurement not in the hardware sense, but in the thermodynamic and informational sense. The network samples a multidimensional configuration space (UTXOs × transactions × nonces), and collapses it to one irreversible state: the block.

This is computation and it is quantum by definition.

To compute is to perform a rule-based transformation of input into output.

To be quantum is to operate over a space of probabilistic states and collapse one into certainty through observation or interaction; also it means how much?

Bitcoin does exactly this. It takes a probabilistic configuration space (UTXOs, transactions, nonces), applies a rule-based transformation (proof-of-work via SHA-256), and collapses it to a single irreversible output (the valid block) paid for with energy.

That’s quantum computation in its most physical, literal form. Not the centralized modern nonsense of simulation on top of quantum particles. What’s your definition of “quantum computing”?

Modern quantum computing, by contrast, tries to extract multiple outcomes from a single entropy pool, assumes reversibility, and evades thermodynamic cost. It’s not grounded. It’s not conserved. It’s a double-spend of entropy masquerading as innovation.

Bitcoin pays the full cost. One measurement, one collapse, one truth.

Temperature becomes the bridge, not metaphorically, but structurally. In Bitcoin, temperature encodes entropy over time. In the universe, it defines the direction of time and structure of space. That’s not coincidence it’s correspondence.

So whether you call it a snapshot of Planck memory or a quantum computer, the core truth remains:

Bitcoin doesn’t model the universe, it runs on the same law.

I think we agree on outcome. We just need consensus on semantics.

The toroid needs more explanation, I hope that doesn’t confuse you.

From this newer paper one question/comment:

Bitcoin does redefine the plank scale; 1 Block ≡ 1 Plank Time (Block). Temperature and length also redefined.

Bitcoin reveals a quantized timespace (not spacetime) we’re both space and time are emergent from irreversible entropy collapse into memory; time, memory and energy are inseparable and space is the computed result. The elliptic curve serves as all available locations in memory for a particle to exist at any block of time. Time becomes the distance between quantum transactions.

It seems time has 3 dimensions and space has 1, but I need to flush this out more.

I think getting rid of “spacetime” is necessary, space is not an empty container unless you are specifically talking about addressable locations in memory and time does not flow continuously. It’s discrete.

😏 excellent.

I will read but from what you said; yes I believe Bitcoin is the working instantiation Theory of Everything. I love your idea to merge the white papers.

I was thinking “Kelvin: A peer to peer eletron(ic) cash system”.

I want to send you my work as well; I’ve got about 77 pages on Bitcoin physics as the quantum computer and I am trying to compress it down as we speak (~13 pages).

'This is my last message to you: in sorrow, seek happiness.'

Fyodor Dostoevsky

#wisdom #philosophy #psychology #spirituality #poetry #art #surrealism #psychedelic #dream #midjourney

'This is my last message to you: in sorrow, seek happiness.'

Fyodor Dostoevsky

#wisdom #philosophy #psychology #spirituality #poetry #art #surrealism #psychedelic #dream #midjourney

It’s not just rules. The whole design is Taylor made to take into account human greed

I’m at work currently but I skimmed through it (it’s quite long). I’ll need some time.

I threw it into my AI for a quick summary and I really love the direction. It meshes well with my work around Bitcoin as the quantum informational system (computer) we can actively observe to test our assumptions.

Through Bitcoin and a reinterpretation of Planck Units, I have revised Boltzmann’s constant to be a universal constant making the entropy resolution in bitcoin’s informational framework relative to that of the universe.

I’d love to share once I’m finished, it may be of use to you.

I have some questions and comments to toss back already but I’d like to read it in full before doing so.

Wild stuff. How long did you sit with this? And how long did it take you to write it all up? It's quite beautiful.

ok buddy. this touches the heart of my profession, so I feel compelled to add my take as a warning and maybe the entertainment of the others here. the author won't agree and I won't be compelled to start a discussion with them for obv reasons. I also don't mean this personally but I'm sure you know the feeling of responsibility when you see a scammer: you call them out.

so this is for anyone else:

a self-published solution to QG (quantum gravity) or a TOE (theory of everything) is a well-known red flag indicator for mental illness in the field of physics. there are many obscure publications like this on the internet. MAAAAAANY. they often "solve the universe". not a single one deserves your attention. if they did, they'd be published in a peer-reviewed journal like 99.99% of all real science, including the revolutionary stuff. and you'd be hearing about them from a nobel-prize committee, not on nostr.

this one, like so many others, is just confused poetry dressed in complicated words to make it sound legit. so here are dr. calle's red flag indicators for recognizing "theory of everything" mental illness papers on the internet:

- single author: even Einstein needed help

- no peer review: charlatans self-publish and often say they get censored etc. but in fact nobody would ever publish this stuff. imagine being mentioned as the reviewer of an article like this, it could end your career (remember, the author usually doesn't have a career to lose to begin with)

- no previous publications: sure, your first paper solves the universe. ordinary wednesday in Bitcoin.

- no affiliation: no university or real insition behind it (nobody would employ this person). sometimes a bs affiliation of a made up one-person "institute" with a complicated name is used.

- weird use of colors, fonts and layout, formatting. use of colored text, bold text, emphasis etc is very non-standard, legit papers do this only in rare cases. if the message is clear, you don't need it.

- "it explains literally everything": as with any mental illness, it rarely remains confined to the core problem but it captures everything. this paper not only solves the universe but also biology, economics, whatever.

I won't mention the most important indicator which is just a mumbo jumbo of words and maths that make no sense or gloss over HUGE gaps of knowledge. the author can play this trick because nobody ever is seriously going to critique their work. this is not obvious to the uninitiated and easier if you know a about the field.

keep your brain safe.

It’s called the timechain for a reason.

nostr:note18gl4ly7a88dx394043sc7z6wyr6hvj7a3fdja65ls5m2tfemwxmqhv57hq

Because you have nothing constructive to add. You’ve only ever attacked me and never my ideas.

Also because you can’t refute them. Bitcoin being the quantum computer would ruin your world view; yet you are a bitcoiner.

Make it make sense.

New npub of mine. I like to recycle. Just spotted your note on Global, will be reading your write up, right now. You have some of the most unique takes, I've ever read🙏🏻.

It think your kinda right but not really. Markets are made of humans. Companies buying bitcoin are made up of humans. When price runs to 500k. The dollars they are raising to buy btc only buy 1/5 what they do today. You don't need as many to fulfill supply. The market over heats. People shit their pants. The down may be less % wise than before but it will come.

Figured I'd show you nerds the future even though you don't deserve it. Using my PowerbellGM2 equation and plotting out the next 20 weeks mirroring 2017 which is very similar in a lot of ways (You can see the last 20 points are lighter) Here is a very close path to what we are going to do. $550K by last week of September and then the pullback. Could come back to as low as 60K by December 2026 but probably more like 100K.

You're welcome.

Figured I'd show you nerds the future even though you don't deserve it. Using my PowerbellGM2 equation and plotting out the next 20 weeks mirroring 2017 which is very similar in a lot of ways (You can see the last 20 points are lighter) Here is a very close path to what we are going to do. $550K by last week of September and then the pullback. Could come back to as low as 60K by December 2026 but probably more like 100K.

You're welcome.