Profile: 23768a4d...
nostr:npub13q338lufw4shlyj7t6grr2gs6029d92x7ayq65tn25enxtpa0u6s33xsza sounds like they are talking about debt.
The entity that determines when the debt will be paid is the issuer.
They can send all the bonds back to the treasury that they like, but they are not getting paid until maturity.
nostr:npub1xy7sxkr350egkeam88eawmz8j4zemw6nzj5h5ws3x7fy064yxxdqy6y6ag am I recalling this correctly?
nostr:npub1aem2tstsjh9yxetrn9732y3x44dj3sw7rtjesv09vlmzxvtryk5s29r94a nostr:npub13q338lufw4shlyj7t6grr2gs6029d92x7ayq65tn25enxtpa0u6s33xsza
More or less correct yeah, and I have no idea what Operation Sandman is. It sounds like bologna.
Foreign nations have zero incentive to dump Treasury holdings, particularly as most other sovereign credit looks like shit in comparison. Higher inflation elsewhere, more credit/default risk, etc.
Treasuries owned by anyone are sold in the open market, so natural buyers would also emerge. The likelihood they all dump? Zero. No evidence for it
Just recently organized my timeline into a few different lists based on content type. Memes, news, analysis, misc, etc., and it really helps me digest content on NAS.
I follow a lot of people, and I noticed I was missing some content from certain accounts.
How am I just now noticing the list functionality? This is great.
nostr:npub1j9w0yn3j3q7nyv358q5ms2pe4ag3q8tp87jp5z6ht54xmuwsyuuqllcvhl
Great clip, this is where I got this great JCD iso:
nostr:npub1xy7sxkr350egkeam88eawmz8j4zemw6nzj5h5ws3x7fy064yxxdqy6y6ag Im calling out the irony, that's it. not the only one who sees it, so must be something there to discuss. She added nothing intelligent or conducive to the big question of "why" are girls doing this? Just shared a lazy opinion that is common sense, but not interesting. If it were a guy saying it you wouldn't of even shared lol so it obviously does matter to you who is delivering the message.
nostr:npub1a2s4fd64mxwlgft6hws84plmkwchzv8fxd6xasdxsysywg3c08xq44hk7y
The purpose of the message isn't about why people do this; the purpose of the message is the irony of the women doing it claiming its empowering. So not sure why you're expecting an answer to that big question, which isn't represented or brought up in the clip at all.
The point of the clip, as stated at the start, is that women who do this claim that it's empowering. She illustrates the irony, then draws additional conclusions.
You're right about her outfit being ironic though.
nostr:npub1a2s4fd64mxwlgft6hws84plmkwchzv8fxd6xasdxsysywg3c08xq44hk7y
One thing I have learned from posting this here: Next time I'm posting the audio-only version.
So many people are focused on the person delivering the message and not the message itself. Pretty sad.
nostr:npub1xy7sxkr350egkeam88eawmz8j4zemw6nzj5h5ws3x7fy064yxxdqy6y6ag pandering in a low cut shirt drives the boys wild.
nostr:npub1a2s4fd64mxwlgft6hws84plmkwchzv8fxd6xasdxsysywg3c08xq44hk7y
Some schmuck like Jordan Peterson could've said the same thing, I would also agree with him.
It's less about who's delivering the message, more about the message itself.