Avatar
Leo Fernevak
23d49394612585706c72908a5e3904f95177ea087b032ddbfcd2862304c7d983
Bitcoin - Art - Liberty

I like to think that bitcoin is half the key to unlock the meaning of life, the universe and everything.

The other half of the puzzle is within our minds and hearts.

42

Also, the recent block 777,777 is intriguing:

777,777 / 21 = 37037

777,777 / 37 = 21021

777 / 21 = 37

(3*7) + (3*7) = 42

(21) + (21) = 42

(3*7) = 21

Alien Isolation. The save game mechanic was brilliant on many levels. The absence of security pushed the player into considering every decision. Your sense of presence and agency was heightened. Every movement mattered.

This is what shapes the sovereign mind over time; we can only trust our own judgement. We can be correct, or we may be wrong, but there is no save game mechanic so we better get it right.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iOomRjsNdD8

Cool fact:

In Polish, zapłazić means 'pay'.

Zap thereby becomes a diminutive for payment. 🙂

AI art = peak fiat mindset.

It can't study you since it has no conscious mind. However we can expect that it gathers data.

Heh, no need for the bot to prove something, it openly admits it is a bot, and its responses are 100% identifiable as ChatGPT 3-something.

Thank you Alana! I will forward the compliments and sats to my wife. She has a treasure trove of embroidery that aren't yet finished. The silver threads look cool in direct sunlight and add atmosphere.

I agree that people should converge on Bitcoin in order to have falling prices and counterbalance the inflation + manipulation, as well as providing property rights to all.

Although I doubt point 1. Isn't it more likely that algorithms might steal our data against our will to use in its training? Personally I don't have a usecase for AI - yet. If I need tools I can generally write them myself and the human mind is more adapted toward creativity, plus, we can know that we have copyright to what we create when we don't use algorithms that use direct sampling data. I would feel terrible if something I generated via AI was created by someone else at a visible level.

Stephen Kinsella is mistaken as usual. If I create an artwork, that artwork does not hinder him from creating his own artwork.

The problem is if someone copyrights something that is so simple that others may reproduce it by mistake. He is using that absurd case in order to dismantle property rights.

I've debated Stephen Kinsella before and he believes that you voluntarily hand over money to a thief that wants to steal your money. I counter-argued that you might *involuntarily* hand over money, due to the threat of force. There can be no voluntarism when force or threat is involved. He had no capacity to argue for his point and resorted to sophistry instead.

Skyrim is memorable on so many levels.

Here is some embroidery work by my wife #[2] , they have been packed down since we moved, just needs some ironing. Two dragons and a rose.🧡✨️⭐️🌟

I will try to find it, there will be boxes explored.😄

Per Bylund is correct in the first half. However he is communist in his proposed solution as he wants to abolish intellectual property rights.

The problem is governments and central planning. The solution is #Bitcoin and separsting money from the State.

Every artist, writer or composer own their work and this is recognized by a self-corrective market as intellectual property rights. We just don't want property rights regulated by central authorities.

This reminds me, my wife embroidered the Skyrim dragon for me several years ago and it's still in one of our boxes from when we moved to Poland. I need to put it up on our wall, I miss it.🙂