By "opt out feature" you mean "privacy by default"?
You can have "start" and "end" dates as well as customize reminders on a per-task basis
Been trying to do exactly that.
And it's genuenly ass. x.x At least, for what I need.
Case in point: https://gist.github.com/IngwiePhoenix/b228996676cfc3b52fe22d707a959aa5
I think I need to put another resolver behind coreDNS...or infront?
Honestly, I have no idea. Looking at sdns, powerdns, unbound and friends.
I don't understand birb.it part, but I guess you would like to have recursor infront of coredns, and that way you can have all of the flexibility CoreDNS offers while doing recursion and caching by unbound.
What is surprising for me is that they allowed registration but banned you later
Believe me or not but I used Lightning before I knew about Nostr exists
What do you mean by owning a domain? ICANN states the following:
> paying to register a domain name is not the same as "buying" it outright or permanently. You do not "own" a domain name. What you are doing is more like leasing the domain name from the registry operator that the domain name is associated with.
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/faqs-84-2012-02-25-en#4
Tbh https://github.com/hzrd149/blossom-server has nice README and config.example.yml is self-explanatory
Maybe I am blind but I haven't seen anyone hating you
Nginx module I am talking about: https://github.com/kyprizel/testcookie-nginx-module
Path are relevant to gitea/forgejo, but I guess it is similar for CGit
```
map $uri $giteach_testcookie_pass {
default 0;
"~*^/api/" 1;
"~*^/assets/" 1;
"~*^/avatars/" 1;
"~*^/\S+/\S+\.git/" 1;
"~*^/\S+/\S+/raw/branch/" 1;
}
```
and use `testcookie_pass $giteach_testcookie_pass;` to selectively disable testcookie in a `location / { ... }` block
I have personal git instance and I used nginx testcookie module to show JS challenge for anyone. But I have whitelisted paths that are used for CLI tooling like `git pull`
Use wss://relay.momostr.pink/ as your outbox
TLS is one of the most popular encryption protocols I would say and it heavily relies on asymmetric cryptography
Are burner messages even a thing at nostr? Given relays model I am not sure it could be really implemented...
1. Self-custody (become invulnerable to cex phishing/impersonators)
2. Never fall into "send your funds and we will double/tripple/etc it"
3. Keep secrets (seed phrase, private keys etc) your secret
I am bad in calculating zeroes in 0.0000163 and converting it to sats
Would you need any reverse proxy? Can sponsor a VPS if needed
You should have offsite logging that attacker cannot wipe in case of compromise of this machine