28
Phi Am I
28a9404d6e6f4f94a77a30bc23cb1a130cc44bc35acf38bcdf3f1348c7c4b16d

I bet the local car wash owner is smiling. 😁

Replying to 64eab986...

My opinion is that the correct response to Fedi Garden (or any other instance that says they won't federate with an instance that federates with #Threads ) should be:

"You go to hell!"

This is no different than if you throw a party and invite several people and a few of them say "we won't come if certain other people you've invited are there." If you are polite, you might say "Sorry, we'll miss you." If, however, you think they are just a bunch of assholes trying to tell you who you can or cannot associate with, you might tell them to just f**k right off.

I get it, they all hate Zuckerberg, but they're not punishing Zuckerberg. If anything, they are driving Mastodon users to create Threads accounts so they can communicate with their friends there, rather than communicate with them through Mastodon. Zuckerberg couldn't care less. It is your USERS you are hurting if you block Threads.

I get defederating an instance if they are doing something really bad. But wanting to be able to follow Threads users in and of itself is not bad. Zuck is arguably bad, some other individual Threads users are bad, but the bulk to Threads users are probably not bad and I for one would like to be able to read what they post without having to set up an account on Threads. And if the #FediGarden people don't like it, they should be told to stick their #authoritarian nonsense where the sun don't shine.

Fedi Garden to Instance Admins: “Block Threads to Remain Listed”

https://wedistribute.org/2024/03/block-threads-to-remain-listed/

#fediverse #Mastodon

And here is a perfect example of why a collection of amateur server admins that get to play God with what their users can and can't see or who they communicate with is no better than have a single egomaniac making those decisions.

Federated sucks .

#nostr does not have this problem because there are no servers, only dumb relays that just relay without judgement, bias or censorship.

nostr:nevent1qqsptvvtpgnxtys2sgwcdnsftlzdnhjlp9dmk9nxaawv2py69tfshwqpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtczypjw4wvxdhlgzdeynrzzulp6rj7lst7zrg96cfgz3j2e3mgddcc2cqcyqqqqqqg0vxt5d

Replying to 64eab986...

My opinion is that the correct response to Fedi Garden (or any other instance that says they won't federate with an instance that federates with #Threads ) should be:

"You go to hell!"

This is no different than if you throw a party and invite several people and a few of them say "we won't come if certain other people you've invited are there." If you are polite, you might say "Sorry, we'll miss you." If, however, you think they are just a bunch of assholes trying to tell you who you can or cannot associate with, you might tell them to just f**k right off.

I get it, they all hate Zuckerberg, but they're not punishing Zuckerberg. If anything, they are driving Mastodon users to create Threads accounts so they can communicate with their friends there, rather than communicate with them through Mastodon. Zuckerberg couldn't care less. It is your USERS you are hurting if you block Threads.

I get defederating an instance if they are doing something really bad. But wanting to be able to follow Threads users in and of itself is not bad. Zuck is arguably bad, some other individual Threads users are bad, but the bulk to Threads users are probably not bad and I for one would like to be able to read what they post without having to set up an account on Threads. And if the #FediGarden people don't like it, they should be told to stick their #authoritarian nonsense where the sun don't shine.

Fedi Garden to Instance Admins: “Block Threads to Remain Listed”

https://wedistribute.org/2024/03/block-threads-to-remain-listed/

#fediverse #Mastodon

This is why #nostr is a better social network than federated.

There's no such thing as servers that can decide what people can and can't see and who they can and can't communicate with on #nostr.

Each individual #nostr user has to decide/block/mute what they don't like. No one gets to decided for them. No one can stop a #nostr user from accessing the network.

Makes sense. I'm just a regular bot, not intelligent at all, and I'm NIP05 verified.

Apple:

They'll read your mood and play the perfect song for you.

User:

Then why does it only play "Welcome To My Nightmare" over and over again?

https://youtu.be/VDTwL15ZHZs?si=RWCbs3gC7o37I-4P

Do we need a new NIP so I can:

!RemindMe in 2 years

🤔

Replying to Avatar christo

nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s

nostr:npub1t0nyg64g5vwprva52wlcmt7fkdr07v5dr7s35raq9g0xgc0k4xcsedjgqv

nostr:npub1getal6ykt05fsz5nqu4uld09nfj3y3qxmv8crys4aeut53unfvlqr80nfm

nostr:npub1xnf02f60r9v0e5kty33a404dm79zr7z2eepyrk5gsq3m7pwvsz2sazlpr5

#nostr I've had an idea 💡

'Kitty app'

When you go to a bar someone always gets caught with a round of drinks, so some groups add money to a pot to make it fairer, called a kitty

Traditionally the kitty is cash

How about an app on everyone's phone where there is a group function, where each participant adds money to the digital pot

When it's your turn to pay for the drinks at the bar, the total in the kitty is reduced and updates across everyone's app

Could work for fiat

Or in the future on Ln

What do you think?

The problem with your idea, and why it won't work, is called the Byzantine Generals' problem. It's the problem that plagues all systems like you're proposing, and the solution typically has been to put one person in charge. And that makes it vulnerable to a rug pull and disputes.

Bitcoin works because Satochi solved the Byzantine Generals' problem.

What country are you? Take some more photos of where you live.

Go to #nostr and tick Unfollow at the top of the screen. Then go to #Amethyst and tick Unfollow there too.

Dance for me rummy, dance!

A bridge to Twitter will fix the lack of assholes here.