Avatar
Frankie Jay
29dd2734ef3f640c98c157af55958bf5ebb6832e428d91e8cb2e623556209208

We now have the technology to make Santa real.

Seven years and the charade is still going strong. I dread the day that I'll have to break the news to my son that jolly old Saint Nick is a giant scam.

However, with recent technological advances, the Santa dilemma may now have a viable solution (and it's not simply installing a 3D printer under your Christmas tree):

Santa = Tesla Optimus

Toys/Elves = China's manufacturing powerhouse

Reindeer = Boston Dynamics dog robot (with antlers)

Making the sleigh fly = Advanced propulsion system (UAPs)

The technocrats know what your kids want for Christmas through in-store behavioural analytics, their internet usage or from their parents' browsing data.

Don't worry, the surveillance state has already marked us all as naughty or nice.

Finally, the most difficult piece to get coordination on is the ability to TELEPORT everything underneath every single tree, all in one night.

Just don't ask for a Boeing 777, their currently out of stock.

Good luck, retards.

To all the based retailers out there, instead of simply jumping on the Black Friday bandwagon... Select a year, or advertise "20 years off", rather than 20%.

Might shake a few normies.

Replying to Avatar Jack K

What makes the entire “quantum Jenga” narrative fall apart is something so simple it’s almost embarrassing: there is no way to verify the threat. If a quantum attacker spent coins, the network would only see a valid spend. There is no signature flag, no distinguishing trace, no diagnostic footprint. The supposed attack is epistemically identical to a normal transaction. That means the entire narrative rests not on verification, but exclusively on fear and trust in anonymous authority. The question then becomes: should Bitcoiners abandon the principle “don’t trust, verify” precisely at the moment it matters most? That would be the real attack; not cryptographic compromise, but moral compromise.

What gives this narrative its psychological bite is that it asks people to act based on a claim that can never be proved and never be falsified. It is the exact structure of fiat, action induced by narrative rather than measurable reality. The irony is painful: Bitcoiners who reject fractional-reserve money for being ontologically unsound now fear a computational threat built on fractionally reserved physics. Modern quantum theory treats unmeasured potential as if it were real substrate, as if one physical state can be “double-spent” across many simultaneous configurations until a mysterious “measurement” collapses it. This is the same fallacy as fractional-reserve banking: mistaking represented potential for conserved reality. Bitcoin was built to expose this fallacy, not submit to it.

The only rational response is therefore to verify the physics, not the rumor. Bitcoin is the only open, measurable system on earth that lets you see the transformation of energy into irreversible information, the construction of time through conserved thermodynamic commitments. It is a sound physical system. Quantum computing, as advertised, is built on a theoretical substrate with undefined existence, undefined simultaneity, and no measurable grounding at Planck time. One worldview believes physics will be mastered in centralized laboratories, mediated by institutions, and dispensed to the public like a computational central bank of “quantum authority.” The other worldview (Bitcoin’s worldview) reveals that physics, at least at the level of entropy, information, and time, already exists in a decentralized, permissionless form that no authority can falsify. Fiat physics asks you to trust its amplitudes. Bitcoin asks you to verify its work.

Now to relate it to something you know quite well; Matthew 6:24 is one of the very few moments Jesus directly contrasts God with anything else, and the thing He chose was money. That alone should make us pause. If we misunderstand what money is, then we misunderstand the rival master Jesus is warning about. For all of human history, we have only ever known false money; debt-issued, manipulable, coercive, created from nothing. If Jesus is drawing a line between God and money, then the nature of money is not a side issue: it is central to the moral architecture of reality.

And here we are, at the first moment in history where something like sound money, incorruptible, finite, verifiable actually exists. Bitcoin shows that perfect money is not metaphorical; it is physics. It shows that value can be rooted in truth instead of decree, conservation instead of expansion, verification instead of trust. So when the quantum-threat narrative appears, framed in fear and unverifiable authority, we should recognize the pattern immediately: it is not physics attacking Bitcoin, it is the same old spiritual temptation wearing new technological clothing. You cannot serve two masters Gary. You either serve a system grounded in truth, or a system grounded in narrative. And right now, the narrative is trying to pry people away from the only monetary structure aligned with truth.

To make the point sharper, Jesus also said:

“Everyone who hears these words of mine and does not put them into practice is like a foolish man who built his house on sand.” — Matthew 7:26

False money is and always has been sand. Bitcoin is the first monetary house built on rock. The quantum-fear narrative is an invitation to abandon the rock and return to the sand, but not by force, but by suggestion and fear.

When you see it through that lens, the real “quantum attack” isn’t cryptographic at all. It’s spiritual. It’s psychological. It’s epistemic. It’s an attempt to make people forget the only principle that made Bitcoin possible: don’t trust, verify. If evil ever wanted to compromise Bitcoin, it wouldn’t do it with a machine, it would do it with a story, whispered in the right moment, convincing people to surrender the very truth Bitcoin embodies.

Bitcoin is not broken.

Thank you nostr:nprofile1qqsd846pynwlkk7uvxu0rrghcve4hw6033c3s234acnnzjjf5n4hk8gprpmhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet5qy0hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnzd96xxmmfdejxjum5wf5kxapwdaexw8x8cj0 for bringing the wisdom of nostr:nprofile1qqsrcn632cfyx5j0xpld9m389370ffuzgp8muwshvcrqgwm26sn7uacpzemhxue69uhkzarvv9ejumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqg4waehxw309ajkgetw9ehx7um5wghxcctwvse30xkv into my field of view.

Yes. I could not agree more that the quantum FUD and controlling narratives is their only play against the sheer resilience that is Bitcoin and its encrypted and verifiable nature.

By no means do I seek to perpetuate this narrative, only to anticipate and know my enemy.

Would they hit Bitcoin with a sledgehammer? Or would they keep a vulnerability to themselves and suppress technology, keeping it out of reach of adversaries and not show their hand, like they always do? Clearly they have not done the former, and the narrative is a precursor while they build their tools of war.

Quantum threat is at least 5 to 10 years away from this possibility, probably longer. Or is that what they simply lead us to believe? They know our mantras, verification is truth. If everything appears to work then nobody doubts its integrity. I for one do not doubt its integrity. I do, however like to run thought experiments to explore views that oppose my own.

Maybe they will never break it, maybe they will be too late. I couldn't agree more that their only weapon is sowing dissent and driving a rift between factions of bitcoiners on how to implement quantum resilience into the network.

Attacking the weakest front, the human element, is always the best play. But in the realm of possibility, using quantum computing to strengthen the network through mining is something only done if the technology falls in the hands of a true bitcoiner.

Yes, it is a spiritual war. May they never break our spirit.

John 14:27

That said, all bitcoin analogies suck because it is unlike anything we've ever known.

Bitcoin is only like a battery the same way money is like a battery. The same way bitcoin is like many things, but it isn't. Because it's better at all of them.

Time and energy in extracted form. Not electrical energy, can't power your laptop. But hold up enough sats and those plebs will turn a turbine.

Quantum Jenga Scenario:

Quantum computing is already able to break bitcoin's encryption.

The entity with this technology seeks to topple the system as carefully as possible, like a well-played game of Jenga.

They have two goals:

1. Acquire as much capital as possible whilst maintaining investor confidence.

2. Destroy the network which has become the greatest threat to the fiat ponzi system.

Prerequisite:

Liquidity must be at such a level to continuously support large sell orders without tanking the price beyond retail holder tolerance, ensuring it does not trigger massive sell-offs. We have undoubtedly reached this level.

Method:

Strategically target the oldest and largest addresses, also the easiest to crack, over a long timeframe to appear as whales exiting a healthy and liquid market.

Avoid coins part of strategic reserves or custodied by large institutions. Target lesser known exchanges.

Keep new investors interested and unaware, with the market appearing as a buying opportunity, drawing in more liquidity.

Identify and eliminate, if necessary, anonymous long-term holders that would speak out if coins were to suddenly vanish.

Encryption was the only thing keeping your coins and your person safe from attack. Consider this safety exploited.

A call to whales - confirm your assets are still there and accessible, move to multi-signature wallets to enhance security and avoid being targeted.

Final thoughts:

Satoshi's coins have long been considered a bounty which stands as proof of bitcoin's resilience to attack.

For this very reason, it will most certainly be the last piece removed before the tower collapses.

https://blossom.primal.net/45dab497ab8f22997807723e0c7b154903a0a5b5a269a55bf209ed9095daa2ef.webp

Imagine a 30% drop in property prices!

0% interest rate and no minimum deposit.

Well, it's here.

No shortage on available addresses either.

Leave no man behind.

This is why everyone will remember your nym.

Mutually exclusive on the vendiagram.

The sun is the origin of all energy on the planet, responsible for the creation of the natural resources we burn for energy/electrification, the cause of wind and the provider of solar power.

Yet the most abundant, decentralised and easily accessible form of energy on the planet is the car battery.

Remember this.

WT£? A pound is unit of measurement.

British Pound Sterling (GBP) was originally equal to one pound of Sterling Silver, which is an alloy consisting of 92.5% silver and 7.5% other metals, usually copper.

The gold standard was officially adopted in 1821, which effectively depegged the pound from silver. British gold sovereigns (1£) contain 0.2354 troy ounces of pure gold.

Britain officially abandoned the gold standard on Sep 20, 1931.

Given the current silver and gold prices in GBP per troy ounce is 31.98£ and 2,735£, respectively, we can effectively extrapolate the sheer level of debasement of this fiat currency.

Silver

31.98 x 14.5833 (troy ounces in 1 pound)

= 466.37

92.5% of 466.37

= 431.39£

94 years average annual inflation rate of approx. 6.47%.

Gold:

2,735 x 0.2354

= 643.82£

Real annual inflation

= 7.13%

WT$ A dollar is also a unit of measurement.

You'd be crazy not to have a plan B.

As the level of organisation in "organised crime" increases, it's inevitable that it reaches the point where it can steal from everyone globally and convince almost everyone that it's not theft and it's only 2% per year.