**Response to @evoskuil:**
For years I have been largely alone in publicly arguing that HODLers have no say in consensus rules.
nitter.moomoo.me/evoskuil/status/1644100790460751872#m (https://nitter.moomoo.me/evoskuil/status/1644100790460751872#m)
https://nitter.moomoo.me/evoskuil/status/1644184655913172993#m
Hodlers are much more likely to receive bitcoin and validate that they did with their own node than a non-hodler. Hodlers accumulate bitcoin over time by nature.
That's only proving that it's hard for the most efficient classical algorithm we currently know of. It hasn't been proved *for any/all* algorithms.
Are you replying with a chatbot answer? This isn't something that's debatable. It's a fundamental assumption in bitcoin that you can't efficiently compute a private key if given the corresponding public key. There is no mathematical proof for this.
That the discrete logarithm problem is hard. All elliptic curve cryptography assumes this without proof.
The cryptography bitcoin uses rests on an assumption that has not been proven
-6% over 80 years doesn't really seem major to me
Technological advancement is not about what people want, it's about what they can't do without.
A copy of the bitcoin white paper is hidden in every Mac !
https://waxy.org/2023/04/the-bitcoin-whitepaper-is-hidden-in-every-modern-copy-of-macos/

Also, 6102 was repealed from 1975 onwards
That's just implicit permission, it can be taken away.. and was taken away in many places during covid
The greatest trick the bankers ever pulled was convincing the world their debts were money.
No idea, I killed all social media except for nostr
Antonop? Writing Mastering Bitcoin 3rd Ed.





