I've been running a fediverse instance as a backup for several years now. nostr is more resilient but I think fedi is resilient enough (and the UX is a million times better)
habaneros come in red? Also boy that looks like it's gonna be a spicy sauce
nostr:nprofile1qy28wumn8ghj7un9d3shjctzd3jjummjvuhsz9nhwden5te0wfjkccte9ekk7um5wgh8qatz9uq3wamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwdehhxarj9e3xzmny9uq3zamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wwa5kuef0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgswaehxw309ahx7um5wghx6mmd9uqzq6xcz9jerqgqkldy8lpg7lglcyj4g3nwzy2cs6u70wejdaj7csnjkyfw8d I only took a quick look, but am I reading nostr-database correctly that it does its own in-memory indexing of all known events in memory, regardless of backend?
If yes, was that intentional, or just a first pass implementation? (Seems weird to not utilize DB-native indexes where available, unless they turned out to be too slow)
Sure seems like a lot of smart devs have run off into a land of completely reckless protocol development meanwhile a sizeable contingent of plebs don't even realize CTV is safe.
The ossifiers seem to have sandbagged the very conservative and safe CTV and the result may be a completely reckless activation of OP_CAT or worse.
As far as I can tell the "script restoration project" is literally blowing the doors open on all of the open ended, bad behavior with unknown incentives we've been worrying about for the past 6 years (or since Satoshi disabled the opcodes in the first place if you'd like). WTAF?
Slowly at first then all at once. Even I'm shocked with all of the moves being made right now...
This should be an easy legal win, however. If Chevron gets struck down this is blatant executive legislation.
I have to imagine all LSPs will be getting pressured like this. Any routing node operator seems targetable too. (Not FUDing but if non-custodying is no longer a defense, lots of stuff gets redefined)
That should absolutely work, but a big part of what makes Phoenix useful to end users is ACINQ's big, well connected node with on-demand liquidity.
Necessity is the mother of invention, plus we have proof-of-concepts for most of these things already. Not saying I'd trust my stack to them but privacy for my day to day stuff? probably in less than a year.
better late than never, though.
So we activating CTV or what? CoinPools are a good privacy enhancement, and we get all sorts of other goodies, too
https://github.com/braidpool/braidpool
Braidpool can hopefully resurrect the p2pool model. It obviously requires more of individual miners, but making solo mining viable again without joining a giant pool is pretty big.
Hopefully it will be low enough overhead to attract some bigger operations, too.
nostr:nprofile1qyghwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnhd9hx2tcpzdmhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2urpvuhx2ue0qyv8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnrw4e8yetwwshxv7tf9uqsuamnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dshsz9thwden5te0wfjkccte9ehx7um5wghxyee0qydhwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtn0wfskuem9wp5kcmpwv3jhvtcqypn4hp87wh3pd2u5036r3mj3njnhw5mkmhc9mt0m5cnch5qju8tjsxn0x09 are you ready for a bunch of new joinmarket users? 😂
Yeah, for selfish reasons the most worrying part is the implication that you can be a money transmitter without actually being custodial (which was more or less the current consensus)
I don't know if anything will come of it, but I want to do longform discussion that could replace delvingbitcoin
I've done very little on it, it's 3rd in my priorities and I don't have much free time to begin with lol