They won't see, because they don't want to see.
She told you to change the name from "Fat Mike" and you squandered the opportunity to change it to "Fatter Michael"?
đź‘Ž
Lucky day!
BM: Drivechains - From a #Bitcoin Miners' Perspective
"Asking miners to adjudicate disputes on a sidechain, potentially many of them at once, doesn’t just add additional business complexity, it changes the fundamentally neutral role miners play in validating transactions."
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/business/drivechains-from-a-bitcoin-miners-perspective
Wow, more unforeseen consequences, whodathunkit?
#gunstr range day is always a good day
https://nostrcheck.me/media/public/nostrcheck.me_5859389443385565181696176818.webp
I'm doing a 2 gun match at the end of this month, gotta zero the new AR prior to that, if you want to do another range day soon.
Turns out there's a significant overlap between gerontocracy and kakistocracy.
Nations aren't private property. I mentioned national borders, not property lines.
Spot on.
Borderless money must yield a borderless world.
If you like national borders, nationally issued fiat money might be best for you.
nostr:npub1s05p3ha7en49dv8429tkk07nnfa9pcwczkf5x5qrdraqshxdje9sq6eyhe , nostr:npub1excellx58e497gan6fcsdnseujkjm7ym5yp3m4rp0ud4j8ss39js2pn72a , nostr:npub1klkk3vrzme455yh9rl2jshq7rc8dpegj3ndf82c3ks2sk40dxt7qulx3vt, Giacomo Zucco and Knut Svanholm tackle scalability, drivechains and the overall state of Bitcoin’s evolution.
You don’t want to miss this! Follow the link below.
Is the conclusion that Drivechains are retarded?
Looks like a cup of awesome.
The sea people were only one aspect of the Bronze Age collapse.
There were also famines, plagues, environmental disruptions, trade network problems, and massive depopulation.
The legacy system is broken, and no one is coming to fix it.
But we're coming in hot to replace it.
Next Jax Bitcoin meetup has been set, hope to see you there.
https://www.meetup.com/bold-city-bitcoiners/events/296195684
If a patriarchy ruled the world men would do nothing but eat Little Caesars with our bros and think about the Roman Empire.
OK, lemme approach this from a different perspective:
Bitcoin isn't absolutely scarce.
If it were, any change to the final supply would be absolutely impossible. Yet some, including a few major figures like Peter Todd, want to change the final supply, increasing it through tail emissions.
If they form a fork that achieves the heaviest Bitcoin chain in terms of PoW, then Bitcoin will no longer have a fixed supply.
This is quite unlikely, but not impossible. If Bitcoin had achieved "absolute scarcity" it would be impossible. Therefore absolute scarcity is not a feature of Bitcoin, highly probable scarcity has been achieved at best.
Absolute scarcity is a bullshit term, better for entrancing the minds of the already convinced than persuading those who aren't.
It's trivial for someone to make a shitcoin that's more scarce then delete the keys so it remains forever more scarce.
But we don't care if something else is absolutely more scarce, because Bitcoin's scarcity isn't nearly as important as its:
• uptime
• network effects
• verifiability
• permissionlessness
• difficulty to censor
• resilience
• predictability