Same as with regular scammers:
- Emotionally charged appeals
- Too good to be true proposals
- Lack of proofs
- High-pressure tactics
- Unsolicited contacts
- Requests for personal information or money
I was thinking that when I lend you good money, I receive a promise from you to pay me back. I can then use that promise as a form of currency to make my own purchases. This means that two types of currency will begin to circulate: sound money (good money) and negotiable promissory notes (bad money). Unfortunately, as per Gresham's Law, bad money tends to displace good money from circulation.
To maintain fairness, it should be noted that even in a fully peer-to-peer economy, some form of credit-based money creation will still exist.
Now I am beginning to understand why ChatGPT often responds to questions with talking points, rather than directly answering them, in an effort to influence people and shape their perceptions.
A way to evaluate the morality of something is to take into account how Alexander Pushkin might have viewed the matter:
Let's conduct an experiment to determine if we can raise awareness about the importance of Bitcoin among the general public. All tips and donations to this post and account will be used to pay an honorarium for writing about Bitcoin's significance in print media for non-English speaking countries. Anyone who publishes a photo of the article they have written about Bitcoin's importance under their own name in traditional print media will receive all of the accumulated Satoshis thus far. Anyone can participate by submitting photos of their articles, sending tips, quoting or boosting this post, and so on.
If Elon had the opportunity to introduce Blue Check 5 years ago at $7mth and you had rejected it and chosen to DCA the same into BTC:
Buying $7 of Bitcoin every month for 5 years starting 5 years ago would have turned $420 into $901 (+114%)
https://dcabtc.com?sd=2018-03-28&sda=5_years&f=monthly&d=5_years&ac=700&c=false
#hodloncomrades don't trade #bitcoin
Your words come true: #[2]
There is no guarantee of privacy in any form of communication, as any correspondent can record and share the content of conversations. The only way to ensure complete privacy is to engage in a secret conversation with oneself only.
There is no guarantee of privacy in any form of communication, as any member of a group can record and share the content of conversations. The only way to ensure complete privacy is to engage in a conversation with oneself only.
HPV is a sexually transmitted infection. Not sure, whether vaccinating a 10-year-old boy would be needed. There is ample evidence suggesting that for girls, a single shot is equally effective as receiving two or three shots:
Unpopular opinion:
The notion that people are equal is a fallacy; differences exist in strength, cruelty, intelligence, and time preference. The Bitcoin standard has the potential to create a new ruling class, a digital aristocracy comprised of individuals who possess these desirable traits and can accumulate a significant portion of Bitcoin. As a result, this concentration of wealth and power could lead to a new world order, characterized by digital feudalism.
Feudalism is outside of these paradigms, too. Due to human nature, Bitcoin can lead us to digital feudalism, which might still be better than current fiat enabled kleptocracy.
Enjoy the silence
Trying to think of examples how it was much different with sound money centuries ago...
Let's check it in couple of years: #[0]
💯Came here to find some documentation.
